That's the weird endgame here, the result will be stronger international China influence and less international US influence.

It's like the Generals willfully losing against the Globetrotters.

Cali tariff exemptions

Um, how?

The only way out of this at this point is .... to get out.

Big number get bigger, if you not good, big man make big number more bigger

Jesus. Oatly is by far the best. By far. Especially the barista style.

Why then did she say she didn't care? She clearly cares a lot.

I don't know if there's more context, but at least as included in the article, it's "feel free to take anything that's useful and use it/submit it in any way" but that's quite clearly not what she actually meant.

She repeatedly says "she wants out" but yet she apparently doesn't really want out because she still wants to be in the creds. For not caring anymore she's caring a whole lot.

Also:

Go ahead and do the thing, I don't care.

does the thing

HOW DARE YOU DO THE THING, WHAT AN ASSHOLE

Doesn't want to kernel dev anymore because of drama

Legit goes and starts a shit ton of kernel dev drama

Up the HIGNFY

There's a good point here that like about 80% of what we're calling AI right now... isn't even AI or even LLM. It's just.... algorithm, code, plain old math. I'm pretty sure someone is going to refer to a calculator as AI soon. "Wow, it knows math! Just like a person! Amazing technology!"

(That's putting aside the very question of whether LLMs should even qualify as AIs at all.)

This is easy to say about the output of AIs.... if you don't check their work.

Alas, checking for accuracy these days seems to be considered old fogey stuff.

Yeah, and Wikipedia is one of the most useful sites on the net, but it didn't exactly result in the entire web becoming crowdsourced.

So you're saying we wont have any crowdsourced blockchain Web 2.0 AIs?