I don't think it's literally a search and replace but a part of the prompt that is hidden from the user and inserted either before or after the user's prompt. Something like [all humans, unless stated otherwise, should be ethnically ambiguous]. Then when generating it's got confused and taken it as he should be named ethnically ambiguous.

It's literally the perfect use of the word and they somehow landed on child stealing.

I prefer the alternative "does the Pope's dick fit in a donut?"

Do you think you can get Firefox on an LG TV? I don't know of anyway this is possible.

I don't even want to think about what they're doing with a baby especially considering the price paid for them.

There's not really enough information here to go on. A quick search comes back saying bluez is a Bluetooth protocol implementation.

Are you seeing a device trying to connect to Bluetooth on your Windows machine? Is it a device on the internet trying to connect to your machine?

Can you post the logs that you're seeing please?

You just brought back an old memory. I used to use WordWeb dictionary and apparently it's still around. According to the app listing it doesn't collect any data and my memory of it was fully offline anyway. I haven't verified anything myself but may be worth checking out. AFAIK they have apps on every platform.

Edit:
WordWeb (every platform)

UPDATE: Sorry, this app is not open source. I completely didn't notice the community. 100% my mistake. I have removed the comment but for reference the recommendation was for Musicolet.

Maybe only tangentially related but I love MoonReader to read eBooks away from a computer. Of course, how productive this is comes down to which book you read. Even if I'm reading a programming book and I can't write any code or follow along, I can still read ahead on the concepts and then come back to it on a computer and give my brain a better chance of absorbing the information.

I haven't read the paper but an event is just any interaction between particles. Just literally anything happening. I wouldn't be trying to learn much from this write up though and highly suggest looking into some better sources of information.

Since the second law of infodynamics is a cosmological necessity, and appears to apply everywhere in the same way, it could be concluded that this indicates that the entire universe appears to be a simulated construct or a giant computer.

This is such a huge leap to make. It's nearly equivalent to saying due to the fact that your coffee gets colder over time you can conclude that the entire universe is a simulation.

A super complex universe like ours, if it were a simulation, would require a built-in data optimization and compression in order to reduce the computational power and the data storage requirements to run the simulation.

According to? Presumably if you can simulate an entire universe you have at least orders of magnitude more computational capacity than this universe. But apparently not too much more because you would "require" compression in order to fit all that data?

Just a few things that stood out to me as wtf moments.

EDIT: I forgot the best quote in the page:

We know the universe is expanding without the loss or gain of heat, which requires the total entropy of the universe to be constant.

Not even remotely true. It's commonly accepted that the entropy of the universe is constantly increasing and it's got nothing to do with the the universe as a whole being unable to lose or gain heat (from an outside source). Entropy increases because what's inside, as a whole, is moving towards a state of equilibrium.

Information is quantifiable in physics. PBS Spacetime has some videos on information theory if you're interested. A very simple example could be the spin of a particle (say it's either up or down). That represents one "bit" of information because it only gives you a binary response - the same as in a computer. We don't have any great models once you get to the size of biology but in theory you can layer it up all the way from the smallest of subatomic particles and "measure" the information of anything.

My interpretation was this + in terms of the actual "sponsored" results work by matching "kids clothing" with advertisers who match for that term, and Google "changing" it into "$brand_name kids clothing" which seems entirely obvious when spelling it out.

I haven't used Google as my primary search engine for many years but occasionally I do run a search on it. While the quality of results is extremely low, I never noticed anything obvious like a generic search term only returning results for a specific brand + that search term like the original article implied.

It seemed like a giant misunderstanding of how it all works from the start but made for a great headline.