[-] stu@lemmy.pit.ninja -2 points 1 year ago

I've never heard a rational defense of moral relativism that made any sense. If there are no moral truths, then serial killers have done nothing wrong for example. If a moral relativist admits that there are some moral truths, then moral relativism is completely indefensible. At that point, you're just arguing over what is and what is not a moral truth.

[-] stu@lemmy.pit.ninja 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There are 2 burdens of proof in trials, 1 for civil trials, and 1 for criminal trials. Civil trials require a burden of proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" and it is much lower than the burden of proof required for criminal trials, which is "beyond a shadow of a doubt". The burden of proof you are describing for Kevin Spacey's criminal trial is actually "beyond a shadow of a doubt", which essentially requires reliable eyewitnesses or a smoking gun, as they say.

That said, Spacey also defeated a civil trial in the US last October for a different set of accusations, so there is that 🤷

I can't claim to know the truth in he said/he said situations like these, but common sense would indicate that there's probably some truth to multiple accusations of impropriety. Victims often don't opt to speak out publicly and go to court unless they think they can win and scam artists are rare.

[-] stu@lemmy.pit.ninja -1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, any economic system that concentrates power into one group is bad, whether it's corporate monopolies or a single government (which ends up kind of like the ultimate monopoly in a communist state). Communists IMHO have a fundamental misunderstanding of human nature and how incentives can be exploited for the benefit of everyone. We need a form of capitalism that promotes competition (because profit is possibly the most powerful motivator of innovation), but also keeps companies in check with strong regulations, strong workers unions, and profits taxed appropriately. It's also important to recognize that some basic needs should be met by the government like public education, public utilities, correctional systems, national defense, welfare, healthcare, etc. But even with public services, there should be room for private companies to innovate and provide premium alternatives to keep the government in check (with exceptions obviously, we don't want private military and private prisons for example).

[-] stu@lemmy.pit.ninja 0 points 1 year ago

Belief in astrology is probably even somewhat correlated to mercury poisoning...

[-] stu@lemmy.pit.ninja 0 points 1 year ago

I'm a little surprised the drop in activity was that low. What the fuck were people browsing when most of Reddit was blacked out?

[-] stu@lemmy.pit.ninja 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Are you going to put it on GitHub? Obviously you're not required to release code until you release a build into the wild, but just curious if we can see your progress in real time by any chance lol

Unless you hate the name Lemmur I don't know if you have to change it yet either.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

stu

joined 6 months ago