15
submitted 1 year ago by swnt@feddit.de to c/anime@lemmy.ml
68
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by swnt@feddit.de to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.world

I've been playing LoL since a long time - practically since my friends etc. started it in 2009. I was on windows back then and moved slowly and slowly to Linux via dual boot. These days I only used windows for gaming and Linux (Ubuntu) for everything else.

While back then, stuff like FLOSS and co. wasn't that important to me - these days I appreciate it much more - and I like to have a computer which just doesn't annoy me with bloat and doesn't do stuff I don't want it to do.

After hearing about the steam deck stuff recently I gave gaming on Linux a try. I just follow the few simple steps outlined in online guides. It was pretty easy to install steam and league of legends. I even played a few very old games on steam - games which I didn't play all the time because I wouldn't boot up windows just for them.

I did decrease the LoL graphics a bit - as my laptop is a bit older. But seriously... League of Legends was working! It was working flawlessly! 🤩 I didn't see any crashes or stuff like that. I played a few games and realised, that I really didn't need to go back to windows anymore.

I'm migrating to a new laptop with better specs soon - and It'll be my first laptop in 1.5 decades that will not have dual boot. 😇 If I ever need windows again I'll either use the dual boot on my old laptop or simply run a VM for such rare cases. But even things like MS Teams work in the browser, so no need for Windows unless it's MS Office - which I never needed yet.

Just wanted to share my recent personal experience 😃

[-] swnt@feddit.de 35 points 1 year ago

it's it though?

in our Fediverse bubble yes.

but so many average people just don't care.

[-] swnt@feddit.de 36 points 1 year ago

This is top internet remix culture

62

I literally dreamt about this "problem" and this "solution" today morning. I was like "what kind of shit is this? perfect for lemmyshitpost"

1
[EU-Petition] Tax the Rich (www.tax-the-rich.eu)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by swnt@feddit.de to c/dach@feddit.de

Da eine EU weite Vermögenssteuer sehr sinnvoll wäre, um die Probleme zu vermeiden, die es bei der Vermögenssteuer gab, welche nur in Frankreich war (und dann wieder zurückgedreht wurde).

Auf EU Ebene finde ich sowas sinnvoller und effektiver als auf DE Ebene. Bei 1 Mio Unterschriften muss die EU Kommission dazu handeln.

Edit: Zählung der Unterschriften findet ihr hier. (danke an kellerlanplayer@feddit.de)

[-] swnt@feddit.de 45 points 1 year ago

That's why scihub is so popular

330
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by swnt@feddit.de to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

Think about it. Isn't light+eyes and ears+sound just the same in terms of their "influence at a distance"? We don't feel that as abnormal or magic - simply because we've sensors for them and are used to it. But physically speaking light and magnetism are based on electromagnetic forces.

121
ich🏠iel (feddit.de)
submitted 1 year ago by swnt@feddit.de to c/ich_iel@feddit.de
[-] swnt@feddit.de 93 points 1 year ago

One of the few companies I've purchased digital good from - and they haven't enshittified themselves yet

[-] swnt@feddit.de 32 points 1 year ago

The possibility (reality?) of CPU backdoors which make it possible for them to bypass cryptography and hence encryption completely is a full game changer. This is a thing that I was only suspecting but now we have more concrete evidence that this actually happens.

And I was called paranoid for this ^^

1
submitted 1 year ago by swnt@feddit.de to c/crypto@lemmy.ml
[-] swnt@feddit.de 26 points 1 year ago

And what do you do after three years? Then the cash will be used up.

Mozilla isn't just developing the Firefox browser. Technology is inherently political - and educating people and influencing actors politically on the free and open web is very important. Firefox is much less likely to mis-align away from their browser users than chrome simply because they don't have the misaligned incentives like the chrome Browser which is equally made by the largest internet advertising firm of the world.

They even has created FirefoxOS for phone at some point in the past 10 years. But I don't remember what happened with that.

[-] swnt@feddit.de 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Irgendwie finde ich dieses neue Format mit der Gans und dessen typischen Einschüchterungsgeste sehr unterhaltsam

edit: typos

[-] swnt@feddit.de 81 points 1 year ago

protect children online

I've yet to see any single new law proposal, that actually tackles this problem rather than misusing it's emotional trigger to get acceptance for surveillance and control

[-] swnt@feddit.de 27 points 1 year ago

Because the police also protects them. Any old fashion violent revolt will be not greeted by population (currently) and the police and government will prevent that with force. the funny thing is, that the police and co. consistently protect the interests of the rich more than the interests of the poor. you'll barely get discriminated if you're rich. and it happens often, that rich people in a city are known by the policemen and they know that they shouldn't fine them - as otherwise they're out of their job.

Many people actually have forgotten, that unions were created because the workers were starting to kill owners of factories/companies due to the massive exploitation. Unions were only powerful, because the alternative - namely violentl death for the owners by being outnumbered - was actually dangerous and had teeth. but these days, unions have much less teeth - and when strikes don't work, violence becomes necessary.

[-] swnt@feddit.de 154 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh, I have two good ones:

  1. Nuclear power causes less deaths per energy unit produced than wind. (source

  2. You have slightly less radiation when living near a nuclear power plant, than living on an average place.

To explain the second: A major misconception is, that nuclear power plants are dangerous due to their radiation. No they aren't. The effect of radiation from the rocks in the ground and the surroundings is on average 50x more than what you get from the nuclear power plant and it's fuel cells. (source). Our body is very well capable of dealing with the constant background radiation all the time (e.g. DNA repairs). Near a power plant, the massive amounts of isolation and concrete will inhibit any background radiation coming from rocks from that direction to you. This means, that you'll actually get slightly less radiation, because the nuclear plant is there.

[-] swnt@feddit.de 79 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Living near a nuclear plant.

Little do they know, that they get more than 50x more radiation effect from the natural surroundings and the rocks in earth than from the nuclear plant 🤭 And our body is really capable of dealing with that since the beginning of our evolution (DNA repairs and co).

https://pages.vassar.edu/ltt/files/2011/04/Screen-shot-2011-04-21-at-1.18.09-AM1.png

here is a chart showing radiation intensities for various sources of radiation

19

(first post here. hope this is okay)

[-] swnt@feddit.de 33 points 1 year ago

Well, yes and no.

The issue is, that rich people take on lots of debt with their assets as collatoral (e.g. Musk taking a loan from the Saudis for buying twitter). If Musks collatoral suddenly vanishes (s.g. Tesla breaks down within a month), then the massive 10 billion USD debt will still be there. And then he'll be very very much in negative wealth.

view more: next ›

swnt

joined 1 year ago