Apparently it's hard to get hired in software. Meanwhile, some of the worst software ever made is being written today. Have you tried using literally any software recently? We're in this "barely good enough to function while being heavily supplemented by tech support" phase. I guess capitalism breeds incompetence as long as it's still profitable?
This is so perfect. Like after all these years someone decided to overanalyze Goldilocks.
Say what you want about DI frameworks, but if I have to remove another fucking global variable so I can write a test, I'm going to cut a bitch.
Watching this New York Post propaganda video yesterday was so upsetting. Comments reveal how racism/xenophobia is still very alive in the US.
Maybe you should be directing this sentiment at the woman who keeps talking about how she killed her dog.
Call me basic, but I have no shortage of new music from Spotify and YouTube. Spotify recommendations plus shared playlists from friends. There are a handful of YT channels that host pretty consistent quality musicians, like NPR Tiny Desk, KEXP, Colors Studios, Zildjian Live.
Sure! Here's a 100PB thumb drive.
Oh gosh I'm so afraid of the anonymous business daddy that told you AI is sexy.
My greatest strength is already also my greatest weakness: hyper focus from ADHD.
I have a feeling you are misunderstanding what is meant by "theorems for free" here. For example, one theorem that is proven by all safe Rust programs is that they don't have data races. That should always be a requirement for functional software. This is a more pragmatic type of automatic theorem proving that doesn't require a direct proof from the code author. The compiler does the proof for you. Otherwise the theorem would not be "free" as stated in OP.
For parties: just buy more pizza
tatterdemalion
joined 1 year ago
Seems like a perfectly cromulent English sentence to me.