Thanks!
The article and tweet say the watch will likely use the W940 and that the GW6 used the W930. Why does the Lemmy post say the opposite of the article?
What about something like "roll for loot" or "loot table", or even "RPG toolbox"?
For what it's worth I find the text prediction is really accurate for me (and it capitalizes I without issues).
I enjoy writing with fountain pens, and I've got to justify the numerous pens and inks I have. I also find it helps me with recall and focus. So I take notes by hand most of the time.
Both worked for me on Sync. 🤔
I'm a frequent user of tqdm, but I've never seen that async example. Very cool!
This exists!
The ASUS ROG Claymore II is an 80% "optical mechanical" with a detachable numpad. Mountain also makes several TKLs and an 60% (the Everest 60) with a detachable numpad. You could also make one using the KBDcraft Kit Adam and Kit Addams.
However, I agree with the others. I think you get the best build quality using a standalone mechanical numpad. If I was going to get a split design, I'd probably get an Ergodox or Keychron Q11 QMK or something similar.
Can you explain these a little more? I don't understand what that breaks. Also, shouldn't the second one be correct if you use a raw string?
I wouldn't mind some shared content from quality communities, like the posts from the machine learning research community.
This is a quality of life improvement I can get behind!
It's not even enabled for Google Workspace accounts, but it's still forced upon you even though you can't use it.