[-] teft@startrek.website 38 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[-] teft@startrek.website 38 points 11 months ago

No one who has been formally disqualified under Section 3 was charged under the criminal “rebellion or insurrection” statute (18 U.S.C. § 2383) or its predecessors so why would Trump need to be?

[-] teft@startrek.website 37 points 1 year ago

Sounds like Poland is going to have to nationalize a train manufacturer.

[-] teft@startrek.website 36 points 1 year ago

Just like Hillary was the only person who could beat him in 2016…

I feel like we’re sleepwalking into a dictatorship because of old fucks thinking they know better and that now is their time.

[-] teft@startrek.website 37 points 1 year ago

Why does anyone think a former republican is anything but a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Did everyone not learn their lesson in Sinema?

[-] teft@startrek.website 38 points 1 year ago

Imagine the shrooms kicking in in that bathroom.

[-] teft@startrek.website 37 points 1 year ago

Nowadays you'd probably be more likely to get a hit by putting an "Anime titties" label on the drive

[-] teft@startrek.website 36 points 1 year ago

Star Trek only promised that it would be a long road getting from there to here.

[-] teft@startrek.website 37 points 1 year ago

Wait, I was told net neutrality wasn't needed.

[-] teft@startrek.website 37 points 1 year ago

As a large language shit poster I am not susceptible to that attack.

[-] teft@startrek.website 36 points 1 year ago

Only the penitent man will pass.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

teft

joined 1 year ago