[-] tetranomos@awful.systems 2 points 6 months ago

he's no brian leiter.

[-] tetranomos@awful.systems 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
  1. metacognitive myopia explained why people didn't/couldn't update their beliefs about the existence of "weapons of mass destruction etc".
  2. dogwhistling the threat of sexual revolution "comrade kamala" (i.e., he's implying hypocrisy when he doesn't understand what lenin's use of the term "prostitute" meant).
  3. playing the fool until you can't (i.e., making his base feel insightful and "seen" as playfully serious, homophilically/mimetically charismatic; e.g., his base feels like their inference-making is being promoted based on linguistic sympathy through the aura of charisma).
  4. from (3) somewhere in his administration they're letting the would-be "fool" base do the grunt-work and creating cover; see "Optimal Team Formation Under Asymmetric Information".
[-] tetranomos@awful.systems 2 points 7 months ago

seems more important that people wanted him to, even if he didn't, as what a settlement might imply.

[-] tetranomos@awful.systems 1 points 9 months ago

doctrine of double effect hours

[-] tetranomos@awful.systems 2 points 9 months ago

the gettier problem

[-] tetranomos@awful.systems 1 points 10 months ago

institution: yet another non-human living asexual hyperobject constantly having sex with itself stopping only to shamefully laugh at the moments in which we respire.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

tetranomos

joined 2 years ago