Even on Windows, Proton drive is hot garbage. It never syncs my files correctly. Has a tendency to leave half encrypted uploads just lying around. Eating up desk space.

Don't even get me started on how long it takes to upload anything. Got a 1 GB file? Good luck!

And that's before getting into the fact that it's proton's third product. It was announced in 2019. 5 years and they still don't have proton drive as a working product.

Another gripe I have is that the Linux VPN client still doesn't support wireguard. Sure, you can download wireguard configuration files. And they work just fine. But changing servers is a pain in the ass because of it.

It's made me seriously consider dropping my visionary plan and moving to a more competent provider.

That being said, proton mail has been fantastic. And I have a ton of domains on it. So it would be a pain to move. I guess I'm just in a stalemate.

Huh, now that's a classic I never thought would get a remaster/re-release! I played this a ton when I was a little kid in the 90s on my Sega Genesis.

Though I'll probably stick to purchasing on Steam. I'm steering clear of Nintendo where possible.

I've tried it before, it's fine but had issues running on wayland last I tried. Did they fix the wayland issues? Looking at the issue tracker it seems like there are still a few open Wayland issues.

kiTTY by contrast has had Wayland support for about as long as I've used it.

Agree, most mainstream distros have it all handled for the most part and it normally "just works".

Now, myself on Gentoo testing on the other hand... Sometimes I shoot myself in the foot and forget to rebuild my kernel modules and wind up needing to chroot to fix things - all because I have an NVidia card.

I mean I take a less extreme take. But I definitely resonate. As somebody with autism, it's really nice to have an impartial chat assistant to turn my stream of consciousness wall of text into something far more digestible. Trying to do so myself often takes hours to construct a message a couple paragraphs long. Where I checked and double check and triple check for anything that might offend somebody or come across strange or not flow well. Etc etc etc.

A lot of these articles don't really investigate the accessibility aspect of these tools. And I really wish they did. I know if one of my friends used chatgpt to help with their messages, I would be completely fine with it.

I dunno what this GM is doing but I find that ChatGPT (GPT4 particularly) does wonderfully as long as you clearly define what you are doing up front, and remember that context can "fall off" in longer threads.

Anyways, here's a paraphrasing of my typical prompt template:

I am running a Table Top RPG game in the {{SYSTEM}} system, in the {{WORLD SETTING}} universe. Particularly set before|after|during {{WORLD SETTING DETAILED}}.

The players are a motley crew that include:

{{ LIST OF PLAYERS AND SHORT DESCRIPTIONS }}

The party is currently at {{ PLACE }} - {{ PLACE DETAILS }}

At present the party is/has {{ GAME CONTEXT / LAST GAMES SUMMARY }}

I need help with:

{{ DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF TASK FOR CHAT GPT }}

It can get pretty long, but it seems to do the trick for the first prompt - responses can be more conversational until it forgets details - which takes a while on GPT4.

Looks like someone already opened a PR to roll back to a retrofitted solution (I had to wait until the weekend before I could find the time to work on this).

The devs are willing to accept a retro-fitted captcha (rather than just mCaptcha) in time for v0.18 and they communicated as such about 9 hours ago (for me). So for me, my push for visibility is complete unless they block the incoming PR for whatever reason. The devs have been made aware that this is contentious and the community could be impacted negatively and they see the need for it.

For me, that indicates that the Lemmy devs will listen to key, important issues, that impact the health of the larger fediverse as long as the community is clear about what the largest issues actually are.

A lot of folks here characterized me as someone wanting to "brigade", but that's not quite true. I just know that sometimes developers don't know what's going on with admins unless the admins are loud, clear, and coordinated. That doesn't mean that I was asking folks to "force" the devs to do anything or be abusive, just that enough feedback might convince them to see things from a different perspective than a perfect technical solution.

I dunno Mr. Google, but I'm fairly sure Azure won't decide to sell of their domain registrar out from underneath their customers.

I'm fairly certain that Azure won't drastically update the "packages" to buy ever 6 months like GCP/Gcloud did.

I'm fairly certain, that given the track record of Google products and services, that this has nothing to do with Azure being "anti-competitive" and everything with Google being known for axing their own products. If I build something on GCP, I can't trust that it will continue to run unattended. I know I'll need to always keep my eyes on the news feed should Google axe another product I was using.

I'll be the odd one out and say I support this model but for other reasons than the technical limitations and scaling problems involved. For me it's more about trying to establish a tighter ring of trust and enable easier user onboarding as the hub could serve as the primary identity store for users on multiple instances.

I mentioned it in some chat earlier, but I think that the Beehaw.org moderation model, goals, and philiosophy serves as an excellent starting point for like-minded communities to build out the hub-and-spoke. It would also give them greater flexibility in maintaining the health of their corner of the fediverse by centralizing identity with them.

This model would, of course, not stop others from creating their own hub and spoke and would break apart the fediverse a bit, so I suppose there should be a way for "hubs" to talk to eachother in a way that resembles what we have now.

From a blocking bad actors standpoint (I'm still upset about Captcha getting removed even if it's a technically inferior solution), it would be far easier to have fewer hubs to need to blacklist/whitelist than having to do it for each individual instance.

I guess to go a bit further, if Lemmy could support both "modes" (as in it can be configured to be hub and spoke as either the hub or spoke, as well as retain the existing functionality for those who don't want a hub) that would be ideal.

To be fair, "Captcha" can now mean those ai photo discrimination tests. Captcha: "Select the cats" - Me: "You call these cats?" Looks at the cartoon depictions of nightmare fuel "cats" as depicted by Picasso.

There are still graphical tests we perform that are much harder for computers to perform - at least without near-nation-state sized financial backing.

Yes, the ol' scrambled captcha has been solved by multiple approaches these days, but Its not nation states I'm seeking to keep out (and I'll be fucked if they ever did, I might add), I'm just looking to make it harder for some internet edgelord's low effort spam attempts.

I'm already in talks with some other admins about a potential fork. Initially we'd just roll back ONLY the captcha change, then work on a better implementation and roll it out in a way that doesn't leave instances exposed.

It would be seamless for most users since it's essentially the same thing as before, just with the Captcha code still included.

Email validation works only until my domain get's blacklisted...

Manual registration only works up until a certain size...

What other effective solution shall I consider? Those aren't very effective to me.