[-] tweeks@feddit.nl 6 points 2 months ago

Lunch is my favourite. Nothing beats a fine sandwich with cheese.

[-] tweeks@feddit.nl 6 points 2 months ago

I agree. the only thing that we can say scientifically is that someone has a specific amount of traits we have associated with the social label 'woman'. These traits are biologically speaking primarily related to reproduction and which role one would be able to fulfill the most effectively. Which does leave room for being able to fulfill both reproductive roles in some way or another.

Our social needs to mark ourselves and others as one of the two is deeply ingrained, but as it's such a grey area under the hood it would make sense to have a more fluid relationship with the topic.

[-] tweeks@feddit.nl 5 points 3 months ago

I wanted to pedantically correct you about the a / an.. but then realised you got me.

[-] tweeks@feddit.nl 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'd say that open for discussion. Even taking a dump can be seen from the perspective of art, although I agree for us humans it's quite far out there.

Perhaps to smallen the gap, think of a dung beetle rolling a ball of poo.

I'm not saying you have to like it or even that it's noteworthy, but art in my opinion as definition can be anything that is created by something. As long as an observer looks at it as if it were art.

[-] tweeks@feddit.nl 6 points 3 months ago

Chrome went to a :D above 99. But I believe they changed that, not sure as I use FF now too.

[-] tweeks@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago

Desktop runs great, but Firefox on Android seems to be noticeably buggy here and there sadly. I still use it, but I can imagine that might drive people out of the ecosystem.

Many people get used to the synchronization of their passwords / bookmarks cross-channel. More advanced users have a separate password management for this I'd figure, but that's not the default for 90% I'd guess.

[-] tweeks@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago

You're willingly confirming something you rate as sensitive, trying to bring more credibility to it by being an extra shout and referencing a virtually unverifiable needle in a haystack 'authority' as Google, but find the sensitivity a reason for not sharing your information.

How can you reason like this?

[-] tweeks@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This, although really hot it terrifies me to no end. I can't focus on the good feels. This position is better imagined.

Edit: While exiting this post I was presented this juxtaposition:

[-] tweeks@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago

He leans on it, don't you see? That's his lean-knee-wee-nee.

[-] tweeks@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, in the Netherlands and at least some other EU countries most train stations have a bike rental system that works by just using a card to unlock the bike for a couple of Euros for 24 hours. So there is a possible solution.

Many people here use that system. It's also possible to buy a (second-hand) bike and park it at the station where you need it, if you'd like.

Edit: Didn't see the post below.. but exactly that.

[-] tweeks@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago

Depends on the restaurant / country I guess; I'm used to restaurants fully splitting the total sum of tips between employees.

[-] tweeks@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago

I think I understand your viewpoint, but personally have a different opinion. I'm not going to a restaurant to socialize with the waiter; although some of those interactions can be pleasant it's still just a functional transaction to me that can go wrong and could be be optimized. My main focus is the people I'm going to the restaurant with and the food/drinks.

QR for the win for me, but I agree fully that most of those apps kinda suck. I hope time will fix that.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

tweeks

joined 1 year ago