Yeah, that's right.
But are enough of the AI generation people going to understand the difference?
I feel like, due to the reduction of quality expectations, they will just end up feeling the same about this as we do about the previous one, despite the difference being visible as night and day for us.
Hey, 5 years ago, they couldn't even solve a HackerRank preliminary coding challenge.
The only problem I see with AI CEOs is that the biggest models will be available to those that already have loads of money, so the adversarial investors get to win.
What's the problem with the Anthropic one?
Of course everyone wants more W cubes! No?
But hey, at least when you tell them their mistake, they say, "You are absolutely correct!!"
I think Dillo might work fine too.
Not a modern browser though, as it hasn't been updated for HTML5.
I remember when postman used to bring little envelopes (sometimes little boxes) to people's homes and was paid by tax money and the small amount of postal fees we paid.
Should have checked the blame before running clang-format himself.
Yeah, I am the same.
I type the code myself, so I know what it actually means, instead of letting AI do it.
It might seem different now, but 10-20 years down the line, they might be the same energy.
AI CEOs might end up doing better, you know?
At least better than the type of human CEOs that decide to go full AI.
You seem to not be taking into consideration:
The reason your client computer needs to know the opponent's location when they are still 1m on the other side of the wall, is because, within the next 100ms, you might make a jump+move action which lets you see their shadow or the tip of their weapon.
The shadows and reflections need to be calculated on your system or the server would be doing too much work and if you find the opponent pop up where they clearly were not, 50ms ago (because the server just told you now), you won't be particularly happy either (I know I won't).
That's how it is done.
If it is a public camera, it has to be a public record.
And if not, then anyone having access to the feed, has to have their whole life (both work and personal) be available as a public record.
If not, then you now have cases where most people can't afford to defend themselves from malicious cop allegations.
To prevent this, anyone arrested, pre-trial has to have access to all searches done by cops, related to the allegation and ability to pull-up 100% of their own footage anytime near the event in question.
If any part of the footage is deleted, due to "technical issues" like, "the footage was deleted" or "some of the cameras were not working", then the arrest is illegal and the police department is responsible for compensation.
Description, because "alt text" can't show it well:
{
emit differentFiles (ckFile.absoluteFilePath(),
otherFile.absoluteFilePath(),
FileCompareWorker::FileComparisonParams{FileComparisonParams::FileNameMatch,
(ckFile.size() > otherFile.size()) ? FileComparisonParams::File1IsLarger
: FileComparisonParams::File2IsLarger});
}
After Alignment
{
emit differentFiles (ckFile.absoluteFilePath(),
otherFile.absoluteFilePath(),
FileCompareWorker::FileComparisonParams{FileComparisonParams::FileNameMatch,
(ckFile.size() > otherFile.size()) ? FileComparisonParams::File1IsLarger
: FileComparisonParams::File2IsLarger});
}
The author might even have read it after handing over a copy.
But that doesn't make, the "people who wrote them" having 'read the articles', because the "author" in this case is more like an "Editor".