63

I entirely understand that the more secure and private a means of communication gets, the less convenient it is. That being said it seems like there should be some way to be reasonably secure while still being able to promote these types of things.

To be completely transparent I am not planning on being said organizer of protests, but recent events have simply piqued my interest in the topic. I've read certain frequently referenced materials like "What is Security Culture", "Confidence Courage Connection Trust", and "Mobile Phone Security for Activists and Agitators". I feel like the more resources I read the more it seems like there is no general consensus on the best solutions even for similar threat models.

So far the only thing I've truly gathered is that if you want the best security and privacy you should just not use online communications, which obviously is sub-optimal for gaining traction.

Some people say using Signal is the best means of communication, but that the use of phone numbers and centralization could be a concern. Some people say SimpleX, but cite concerns about notifications or how it hasn't been around long enough to be fully vetted. There's Briar which actually seems great but goodbye to every iPhone user.

Is there any completely solid answer to such a scenario where privacy and security must be upheld while maintaining outreach? I get all things will have their tradeoffs, but is the best solution really just using network communications as little as possible and being careful about your presence?

[-] umean2me@discuss.online 2 points 1 week ago

I will spice up your life I'm an independent voter and didn't vote for Orange Nero :D

[-] umean2me@discuss.online 4 points 1 week ago

One of these will make the news and one wouldn't. If the goal of a protest is to spread awareness and draw attention, going to where politicians live will probably get you a restraining order and a cozy ride in the back of a police vehicle and the protest will likely go unnoticed.

Not saying these types of protests are not necessary or unhelpful! I'm just saying that, in order to draw the most attention to your cause, you inconvenience daily lives. Those are the things that make headlines and viral posts, not a secluded protest on private property.

[-] umean2me@discuss.online 3 points 1 week ago

This is what I was trying to say but didn't have the foresight to elaborate and that seems to have earned me some downvotes lol

[-] umean2me@discuss.online 3 points 1 week ago

It is not natural to be racist.

[-] umean2me@discuss.online 1 points 2 weeks ago

I honestly don't understand point 1. no matter how much people say it.

Maybe I'm naive because it wasn't confusing to me personally, but it is only one extra step to create an account. When people explain the Fediverse to new people they compare it to e-mail anyway, which basically has the exact same sign-up structure. The only difference to me is the way it is advertised. Nobody in general says "you need to join e-mail", it's usually "join GMail" or "join Yahoo". I don't know how it would be solved without detracting from the "choose the instance that is right for you" experience though, since the instances with the most support and funding will obviously hold the most influence (as we currently see with lemmy.world and lemmy.ml, not to mention pixelfed.social).

IDK maybe I'm wrong, lmk, but I don't think choosing an instance is all the friction it's said to be.

The big instances are definitely slower though.

umean2me

joined 2 weeks ago