Yeah, you're right, better to stay stagnant and not bother improving the system so that America stays true to its heritage. Everything was better back then, workers rights, women's rights, slavery...gods the founding fathers really knew their shit. Why try to improve on perfection?
(MASSIVE /s so I don't get downvoted to oblivion)
God this take is such a loser position. "Fine, I'll just take my ball and play a different sport!"
Guess what dummy, you're playing soccer with these Yahoos whether you like it or not so pick a fucking side and THEN ALSO DO MORE."
...burn the fucking barn down with the animals in it, ya dumb bystander...
The information in the hallucinogenic section about acid flashbacks is incorrect. This was a false rumour spread in the 70s to demonize the political opponents of Nixon.
David Rosenberg preaching doom? Well we should definitely listen, because he's accurately predicted 912 of the last 3 recessions.
This dude is the ultimate broken record.
Those are the people making America great again!
David Rosenberg is a perma-bear. He is trotted out like a circus pony every time a news organization wants to print a scary headline about the markets. His analysis offers nothing of distinct value because he does not change his opinion.
David Rosenberg has successfully called 86 of the last 3 recessions.
This is a useless article, written via the opinion of one of the most useless economists.
The cynical-but-statistically-true answer is that this law targets the people that they want to put in jail / don't want to vote. It's a historical, systemically racist piece of law that benefits the incumbents and status quo.
Otherwise they'd have to consider putting people like themselves in prison, or prosecute white collar crime, and that just won't stand for the GOP.
Ah, I see the Free Speech Absolutist is hard at work again. Did these guys report on just how drug-addled Elon was the other day, or was it some other piece of fact-based journalism that got them booted?
Honest question: with this level of complete insanity in a legal filing, what are the chances that a deranged sov cit who has somehow passed the bar, is disbarred? Surely a point blank refusal to acknowledge the authority of the legal system is grounds?
I mean, if the law doesn't apply to anyone who says the magic words in the right order, then this person shouldn't be too upset they're being removed from representing that legal system, right?
Always convenient how these biased 'opinion' writers forget that these problems existed well before the Liberals were in power, and that their buddies in the CPC didn't do fuck all about it in their tenure either.
Backwards looking blame as always. Boring writing.
The Western Standard is a far-right tabloid written by and for a bunch of raging cunts who refuse to mind their own business.
Jesus fucking Christ, that was allowed on broadcast television? What the fuck