[-] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

You are a Zionist front. The community contributors and moderator parrot debunked Israeli propaganda, and conflate anti-Zionism with antisemitism.

The particular term might not be my own way of describing the community, but it is generally an accurate observation that you dwell in a rabbit hole of reactionary misinformation.

[-] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 hours ago

The mod log shows no actions against you by Lefty Memes.

[-] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

To be fair, Russia fell under assault from the imperial core the moment a proletarian revolution met with success.

Soviet expansion began from within a context of such assault, with colonialism of the core having already been established as the hegemonic global order.

[-] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 hours ago

It is certainly in your interest to be conscious of others seeking that you be duped or manipulated.

The wealthy and powerful constantly deploy their massive resources to deceive the public into following a path that benefits those on top while keeping the mass of society repressed.

The long history of the US lying to its own population to justify overseas wars offers only among the most obvious examples of deceit being employed by the privileged in favor of the privileged.

As crises and discontent escalate around the world, the catalyst for such interests to create distractions from the real problems only becomes more substantial.

Overcoming such challenges begins with our recognition that effective solutions will not be handed down from above.

I have found it particularly ironic that Americans constantly lament the foolishness of trusting the government, yet they follow hook, line and sinker whenever state interests align with the public being made fearful of yet one more enemy.

[-] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net -1 points 12 hours ago

I responded to your question appropriately, by observing that it is based on a distortion of language.

Hamas is, de facto, the current Palestinian resistance against Israeli atrocities.

Try asking a question politely and in good faith, if you genuinely want answers that promote the quality of discussion.

[-] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 0 points 12 hours ago

Bad Hasbara.

You are repeated debunked Zionist propaganda.

[-] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net -1 points 12 hours ago

Terrorism is when acts of terror. I am very intelligent.

[-] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net -1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Hamas emerged from within the context of a brutal occupation.

Before Israel, there was no Hamas.

Before the Nakba, there was no Hamas.

Hamas is fundamentally a construct of colonial resistance.

It is not seriously a threat to any interests except Israel atrocities. Even if it did threaten Palestinians, the threat would be dwarfed by such atrocities of Israel. Palestinians are far safer through Hamas than they would be without Hamas. It is easy to imagine a superior alternative, but none actually exist in the present.

[-] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net -1 points 12 hours ago

Palestinians would be in graver danger without Hamas. They correctly understand that their enemy is not Hamas. If Israel were defeated, then Palestinians would have much more expansive opportunities to develop different political configurations.

[-] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 1 points 13 hours ago

Once again, your argument is circular and inane.

You are begging the question, of the particular acts and the reasons for their being characterized as terror.

The fact is that Israel labels Hamas as terrorist, because doing so function in service of its state interests. However, Israel has no credibility, and all of its claims should be strongly scrutinized.

[-] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 1 points 13 hours ago

Hamas is labeled terrorist because it was assigned the label by Israel.

Hamas is terrorist only as much as one terrorist entity is credible to decide exactly which groups or factions are terrorist.

More generally, terrorist simply is a label states assign to their non-state enemies.

By the same standards, the Continental Army would be terrorist, as would be been essentially every belligerent that has engaged in anti-colonial struggle.

Regardless, it should be concrete facts, not abstract labels, that are used to support arguments and conclusions.

[-] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 1 points 14 hours ago

You are conflating issues that are distinct.

view more: next ›

unfreeradical

joined 2 weeks ago