I wish I had your faith in humanity. Yep there are people that would burn more out of spite. And even more that would elect people being for moderate or no climate action.

That's because it's an automated system. There were no code changes in months and therefore no change in the nightlys....

Edit: At the time of writing I thought this was about eternity nightlys

My use of language could very well be incorrect. I am not a native English speaker anyways. That's no reason to be so condescending.

I was just merely stating my credentials to have a basis of discussion but you do not seem to be interested in that.

I know. I've studied this extensively. I am specialized in formal logic and by extension set theory. I've worked with and help write actual research papers in this field where this is basic knowledge.

I've never claimed there to be a bijection between the reals and the natural numbers. Please point out what statement I made that is wrong. I would very much like to know.

Also no you do not have to accept choice for this to be true. ZF is perfectly acceptable to study various infinite sets with differing cardinality.

Edit: This is what I mean when I say that our intuition is broken. One set can be larger than the other but both be non-ending that is infinite.

Beeing larger does not mean it is more infinite!

That is the way it is often taught but actually both sets are infinite that is have no ends or in other words are not bounded.

The thing that is confusing to understand is that the question how many there are and how much there is diverges at infinity.

Our intuition (as finite beings) is broken here. Both sets are infinite but in one is more than in the other. That does not make one set more infinite than the other. You cannot be more unending than to literally have no end.

What makes jobs real?

I was just pointing out that your emotional plea, that this technology is just autocorrect is not an argument in any way.

For it to be one you need to explicitly state the implication of that fact. Yes architecturaly it is autocomplete but that does not obviously imply anything. What is it about autocomplete that barrs a system of the ability to understand?

Humans are made of meat but that does not imply they can't speak or think.

That is not an argument. Let me demonstrate:

Humans can't communicate. They are meat. They are not communicating. It's literally meat.

What if it is their first time actively using open source software? Do you realize that this attitude scares people away from foss software?

And it's not only op. It's also all the newbies that stumble on this post.

Leider wird das nie wirklich definiert in den Debatten was den genau höhere Vermögen oder Einkommen sind

I find it scary that some people are afraid to do simple arithmetic and the most basic geometry...