As a designer, there is a limited purpose to use generative graphics as assets in a composition for various purposes. I might want to generate a cloud background, or perhaps a small object to use here or there. Certainly not an entire composition, because they always come out bizarre or warped, or having some sort of weird hallucination in them. But generative AI can create, for example, a flower, or a building to be used in background, or to cover up an empty space. Once you place that item, then I would have to go in and touch it up a bit to make it look like it fits and adjust the lighting and fix any weird quirks that might have, but it’s a lot better than having to have a photographer go out and take a photo of it or to pay for a stock photo of it and license that plus every problem that comes with that.

So generative AI tools in Photoshop, for example, can end up saving a lot of time and effort and money for licensing stock photos, especially when I only need a portion of it, but it doesn’t comprise but a small portion of an entire composition. 

not as much as imagining that rather than the possibility that your trolling is, oh, say, unpopular.

but, sure, a paranoid delusion of yours is way more reasonable that you facing consequences for your actions. totally… lol

“everyone I hate is a liberal!”

lol

If you don’t engage in good faith

you’ve been trolling me since your first comment. to act like you’re interested in “good faith” anything is hilarious, but not as hilarious as acting like a victim because I didn’t give you the satisfaction of getting angry like you 💋

“DARVO is an acronym used to describe a common strategy of abusers. The abuser will: Deny the abuse ever took place, then Attack the victim for attempting to hold the abuser accountable; then they will lie and claim that they, the abuser, are the real victim in the situation, thus Reversing the Victim and Offender.”

“I know you are but what am I?” isn’t a convincing argument. most people learn this when they’re 5.

yeah, you’re definitely lost.

it’s sad that you have to keep telling yourself that, despite zero facts to support it.

You don’t seem to be capable of following the conversation

I’m perfectly capable of noticing when people move the goalposts because they can’t prove their argument with facts, as I keep pouting out. raging about it doesn’t change this fact or any other facts.

Oh my, you are really lost!

not according to the facts. if this continues to confuse you, that’s not my problem.

I’m sorry that I do not know how to find search results from 2001

not my job to prove your argument.

Yes, that’s why I was trying to figure out why you are struggling with them.

“I know you are but what am I?” is not a convincing argument. most people learn this when they’re 5.

you’ve presented nothing but anger, insults, and logical fallacies, none of which are convincing of anything other than that, when you can’t argue the facts in good faith, you resort to these bad-faith tactics ad nauseam because, so blinded by anger and hate, you can’t handle defeat.

Well that pretty much confirms my suspicions

so you admit to arguing from a position of clear and obvious bias. we get it— you hate the US. this has zero bearing on the facts— just that you like to insult people when you lose an argument.

Ah, so you do realize that it makes absolutely no sense lol

I’m not responsible for your lack of comprehension.

Looks like my job is done here. Rage on, little snowflake.

the finest projection in all the land.

🤡 “Why would you post world news in a world news community? Who cares?”

when you have t twist my words into something other than what they meant just to score imaginary points, it’s not me who looks bad… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

yikes! what assholes!

is this guy going of an insanity plea?

Not only is this hilariously reductionist, it belies such an ignorance of both Marxism and communism in general, that it borders on misinformation.

If you have to keep moving the goalposts this much and swing around the no true Scotsman fallacy like a cudgel, you should just admit that you lost the argument instead of digging, the whole, deeper and deeper.