[-] whoami@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 4 months ago

Fursan Al-Aqsa

looked based, until you realize no linux support :(

[-] whoami@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 6 months ago

Just responding to say I love your username OP lmao

[-] whoami@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 8 months ago

I have to use it at a job. It's awful, the ads on windows 11 especially.

[-] whoami@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 9 months ago

Debian stable.

[-] whoami@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 9 months ago

NetBSD didn't fork from Free iirc. They took 4.4 BSD and started developing it themselves of the net.

Theo de Raadt was kicked out of netbsd, and started OpenBSD.

15
[-] whoami@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago

the thing it offers is no systemd, and the mx-linux gui tools to configure your system. Also the advanced hardware support (AHS) is a neat feature. They basically take Debian and make it slightly more user friendly. It's just less well known than something like ubuntu or mint.

[-] whoami@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

No it's not widely used. But I think it has a small loyal community. Some people really love it. I've only tried it a couple of times, and only on virtual machines. I liked doing admin via text files, and I like that using the "kitchen sink" option you basically have a tool for every task after install. It's linux but sort unixy or bsd-like in how it approaches some things. That works for some and not so much for others. I might try it out again, but most likely I will stick to Debian.

If you want more software it's up to you how to do it. With 3rd party tools like sbopkg it's easier than before, and with tools like flatpak install other software is even easier.

There is also slackware current, and all the other repos, like the work alienbob does to provide plasma desktop etc.

[-] whoami@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 year ago

I like it, for the most part. Obviously you need to check to see if your hardware is supported, but it's a good OS. It's stable, has neat features like boot environments, and it with pkg and the ports tree you can have newer versions of software. Also, they don't make changes to the OS for the sake of it, or because one person or group wants it. They make change with a clear plan in my mind. Sometimes that means features land later in FreeBSD, but they're implemented more thoughtfully imo.

OpenBSD and NetBSD are also cool projects in their own right.

[-] whoami@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago

even when chrome was obviously faster, and was gaining in popularity, I still used FF. It's my preferred browser, and using it along with ublock origin makes going online more hassle free. Add to that multi account containers, reader mode, and just the general ability to customize it, I really can't see myself using another browser

43
submitted 1 year ago by whoami@lemmygrad.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

Maybe this is better asked elsewhere, but question basically in the title. I was wondering if anyone had any experience with Mozilla VPN, and if so what they thought about it.

[-] whoami@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago

btrfs and snapshots is one solution

Also, it looks like you were able to solve the problem, even if you aren't 100% sure why. Maybe the difference in package versions lead to some problem with the bootloader, causing it to go to emergency mode, and updating it fixed the problem?

Another is using a more stable distro....

[-] whoami@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I heard about this a little while back. I think it's interesting, and it's nice to see someone try something slightly different. The creator is obviously opinionated about how their distro should work. At least it's not just another debian/ubuntu based distro.

[-] whoami@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago

vlc

for just music/audio musicolet is a good one

2
submitted 2 years ago by whoami@lemmygrad.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
view more: next ›

whoami

joined 2 years ago