I mean, you cannot meet an objective assessment of art but I don't think the portrayal does that. There is a strong split in the criticism amongst the Fandom where a significant element don't think it is either. To the point that in Fandom spaces when someone brings that up as a positive they are shunned. Conversely there are specifically fandoms for that kind of thing and they do not appreciate the work. So that's two voted against. Now I know the generla level of medica literacy for the anime Fandom is slow so I don't know how to weigh that evidence. So in the end I don't know. I just think that the work appart from that has intresting artistic value. I feel like since the property is not going to get another season it never going to be resolved and I see no artistic value in trying to do so. For sure if that is your take I respect that and I no reason to disagree with you or try to change your mind. It is ultimately not the part of the work I find Intresting or valuable to consider. Given that positive depictions of sexual violence are the industry standard. It's not great. I think GS comes close enough to a critique of that standard that it is creatively intresting. However as we have here the discourse doesn't go past the first episode so that conversation never goes anywhere.