477
submitted 1 month ago by blibla@slrpnk.net to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

I hated when mice became the primary interface to computers, and I still do.

[-] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

tell me you use i3 without telling me you use i3

[-] HeartyOfGlass@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

You have passed the test. We can be friends.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago
[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Even for like 20 years after mousing became the primary interface, you could still navigate much faster using keyboard shortcuts / accelerator keys. Application designers no longer consider that feature. Now you are obliged to constantly take your fingers off home position, find the mouse, move it 3cm, aim it carefully, click, and move your hand back to home position, an operation taking a couple of seconds or more, when the equivalent keyboard commands could have been issued in a couple hundred milliseconds.

[-] Wav_function@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I love how deeply nerdy Lemmy is. I'm a bit of a nerd but I'm not "mice were a mistake" nerd.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I don't think mice were a mistake, but they're worse for most of the tasks I do. I'm a software engineer and I suck at art, so I just need to write, compile, and test code.

There are some things a mouse is way better for:

  • drawing (well, a drawing tablet is better)
  • 3d modeling
  • editing photos
  • first person shooters (KB works fine for OG Doom though)
  • bulk file operations (a decent KB interface could work though)

But for almost everything else, I prefer a keyboard.

And while we're on a tangent, I hate WASD, why shift my fingers over from the normal home row position? It should be ESDF, which feels way more natural...

[-] Wav_function@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Thanks, I got you beat on ESDF though because i'm a RDFG man, since playing counter strike 1.6. With WASD they usually put crouch or something on ctrl but my pinky has a hard time stretching down there, but on RDFG my pinky has easy access to QW AS ZX, and tab caps and shift with a little stretch. It's come in handy when playing games with a lot of keybinds.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Pfff, minutes after trying to minimize your nerdiness, you post this confession.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

What pisses me off even more is many games bind to the letter instead of physical key position (e.g. key code), so alternative layouts get a big middle finger. I use Dvorak, and I've quit fighting and just switch to QWERTY for games.

I don't have a problem with hitting control (I guess I have big hands), but I totally agree that default key binds largely suck. I wish games came with a handful of popular ones, and bound to key codes so hs Dvorak users (or international users) didn't have to keep switching to QWERTY.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

That feel when you switch languages to chat and the hotkeys don't work

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Yup. My SO speaks another language, so we absolutely feel this.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I always rebind to ESDF if the game doesn't do stupid things preventing it from being practical. The addition of the 1QAZ strip being available to the pinky is a killer feature all on its own. I typically use that for weapon switching, instead of having to stretch up to 1234 and take my fingers off the movement keys.

Tablets are better than mice at drawing, modelling, and photo editing. Mice are good for first person shooters. Game controllers are better for most other games. You can mouse in dired-mode i guess, if you're a casual.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

The problem is they generally use E and F for something, which results in a cascade of rebinding.

And yeah, tablets are better, but they're also more expensive and don't do other mice things. For how rarely I do 3D modeling and whatnot (pretty rare), making sure my mouse has a middle button is plenty.

And yeah, I much prefer controller, even for FPS since I don't play competitively (even then, I've seen awesome videos about gyro aiming).

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

E and F is certainly is a problem, but developing your own custom key map is almost always part of a larger process of becoming more effective anyway. Typically I start by just moving all left-hand bindings right by one key.

I feel like the mouse is a good generalist, jack of all trades input device, but outside of fps, I feel that any task that quote requires unquote a mouse is done better with a tablet. They are of equivalent price, honestly. Mice are not cheap, tablets are not expensive.

Right now I am using voice dictation because it is better than typing on a phone, but oh my God it sucks so bad.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

I generally don't play the same game consistently and rarely spend more than 40 hours (usually 10-15) in a given game. For most of the games I spend more time in, it's either mouse driven (most strategy games) or I use a controller (most third person/top down games). And for the few I play that use WASD, my kids also play on my computer (e.g. Minecraft).

So I just don't edit keybindings very often. I actually sometimes avoid playing WASD games because fixing the keys is a pain, especially when some games don't update the in-game hints or don't warm when there's a collision (silently unbinds the key). It's annoying and I don't understand why it was ever a thing.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Takes thousands of hours just to git gud! I play for the sense of fluency and control that only comes with extending your sense of body and self into the game world. I play strategy games to relax, but I play my mains to channel the torrents of energy swirling around in my head.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Lol, I used to be that way. But now I have kids and don't have hours to git gud anymore, so I go for variety of experience instead of depth, except for a handful of strategy games I really like (Paradox games mostly).

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I love my vasectomy more than my dad loved me. ;-)

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

๐Ÿ™

That said, I'm probably getting a vasectomy soonish, because we've definitely had our fill.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

I really love my vasectomy. You'll kick yourself you didn't do it sooner. (No sooner than your last child, I hope.)

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That functionality (first necessary, then required by guidelines, then expected, and then still usual) disciplined UI designers to make things doable in a clear sequence of actions.

Now they think any ape can make a UI if it knows the new shiny buzzwords like "material design" or "air" or whatever. And they do! Except humans can't use those UIs.

BTW, about their "air". One can look at ancient UI paradigms, specifically SunView, OpenLook and Motif (I'm currently excited about Sun history again), Windows 3.*, and also Win9x (with WinXP being more or less inside the same paradigm). And one can see that of these only Motif had anything resembling their "air". And Motif is generally considered clunky and less usable than the rest of the mentioned (I personally consider OpenLook the best), but compared to modern UIs even Motif does that "air" part the way it seems to make some sense, and feels less clunky, making me wonder how is that even possible.

FFS, modern UI designers don't even think it's necessary to clearly and consistently separate buttons and links from text.

And also - freedom in Web and UI design has proven to be a mistake. UIs should be native. Web browsers should display pages adaptively (we have such and such blocks of text and such and such links), their appearance should be decided on the client and be native too, except pictures. Gemini is the right way to go for the Web.

[-] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Sounds like I'm glad "home row" style typing fell out of favour. It may be the theoretically fastest way to type eventually, but it seems to lead to pretty rigid behaviour. Adapting to new things as they come along and changing your flow to move with them instead of against them is just a much more comfortable way to live. Even if I only type 80% as fast.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I have no idea what you mean by "fell out of favour". Does your keyboard not have pips on F and J? People still touch type. Dunno what to tell you.

You're getting hung up on "home row". You still have to move your hand from the keyboard to the mouse and back. It's the same problem, whether or not you know how to type well and stare at your hands, except now you have to add steps for "look at the screen" and "look back at your hands".

[-] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Fell out of favour in that it isn't taught as "the correct way to type" any more. Largely because most devices you type on now wouldn't even have physical keys. So learning home row typing for the occasional time the thing you are typing on is a physical full sized keyboard just disrupts the flow of everything else.

Being perfectly optimal isn't as productive as it feels, especially when it leads to resistance to change and adapt.

[-] Ledivin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Home row is absolutely still taught as the "correct" way to type. Source: kids are in elementary school

[-] abofim@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So I see you clearly haven't heard of i3, sway or hyperland ...

[-] dezmd@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

To an extent. Early 90's I could navigate WordPerfect in DOS faster than I've ever been able to work in MS Word, because it was all keyboard even before I learned proper home key 10 finger typing in high school. Technically my first word processor was Wordstar on one of those Osborne "portable" computers with the 5-inch screen when I was a young kid, but Wordperfect was what I did my first real 'word processing' on when I started using it for school projects. So I might just be older in that 'how do you do fellow kids' in this sort of discussion.

To this day, I still prefer mc (Midnight Commander, linux flavored recreation of Norton Commander that does have a Windows port (YMMV on the win port)) to navigate filesystems for non-automated file management.

I've been thoroughly conditioned for mouse use since the mid-late 90s (I call it my Warcraft-Quake era, we still used keyboard only for Doom 1/2 back in the early days), and I feel like it's a crutch when I'm trying to do productive work instead of gaming. When I spend a few days working using remote shells, I definitely notice a speed increase. Then a few days later I lose it all again when I'm back on that mouse cursor flow brain.

[-] apostrofail@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Early โ€™90s*

You got it right the second time though, champ!

this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
477 points (92.5% liked)

Technology

60123 readers
1675 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS