415

McConnell on Ukraine proxy war: "We haven’t lost a single American in this war. Most of the money that we spend, is spent on replenishing weapons, so it’s actually employing people here."[paraphrased] (edition.cnn.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Fissionami@lemmygrad.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

763 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Mitch McConell says the quiet part out loud.

Exact full quote from CNN:

“People think, increasingly it appears, that we shouldn’t be doing this. Well, let me start by saying we haven’t lost a single American in this war,” McConnell said. “Most of the money that we spend related to Ukraine is actually spent in the US, replenishing weapons, more modern weapons. So it’s actually employing people here and improving our own military for what may lie ahead.”

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/4085063

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] diffuselight@lemmy.world 86 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That’s what a win win looks like. No need to be quiet around it. Russia illegally invaded Ukraine. Now everyone gets to replenish and modernize their weapons, test them in real conditions while making sure Russia gets enough of a bloody nose to not fucking try this shit ever again.

Russia did the ‘fuck around and find out thing’. It was their choice and the only way they can win is by tankies convincing every other country that just saw rape, murder, pillaging and terrorism getting used on another country in Europe by a rabid bear that somehow Russia was justified and should be allowed a free pass. But it’s not working. The rabid bear is rabid, but there’s ways to deal with that.

Because now they makes sure that every country around them is joining the anti rabid bear alliance.

The way the OP framed the article is to create the idea that somehow Russia is good because US military is bad. But that’s a fallacy. The US military is perfectly capable of doing bad shit on behalf of the US, but that does not mean everyone else is good. Sometimes clobbering Nazis is win win and Russia should have know that. Their feeble at reframing may work on Fox brainwashed Republicans who are reduced to “Putins kills gays and is strong so Putin is good”, but it turns out Putin is a cuck taking it into the ass by his own chef.

[-] Gsus4@feddit.nl 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep, but could you please edit out the "cuck taking it in the ass" business? "Humiliated" works and doesn't make you sound like a "homophobic trumptard". We're managing to have a civilized discussion here and I don't want to see this devolve more into reddit.

[-] Zoboomafoo@yiffit.net 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Even worse than that, it's a misrepresentation of the cuck/bull relationship dynamic!

[-] electrogamerman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Thank you for pointing that out.

[+] SlowNoPoPo@lemm.ee -24 points 1 year ago

It's funny because inane corrections of a good post is exactly what happens on Reddit

[-] Gsus4@feddit.nl 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not inane, maybe I'm a cuck who likes to take it in the ass. Now what? How are you supposed to offend anyone with that? In what way is putin like me?

PS: I'm not trying to be hostile, btw, I just think it's filthy language that we absorb and then becomes mainstream and all of a sudden we're like "cuck this, that cuck that" and we already have enough of that around. :/

PPS: back again. I'm not trying to stop anyone swearing or to police speech, if you wanna say it, whatever. Swearing is a healthy practice that helps vent and we have plenty of shit, dick, fuck and assholes to go around, I just don't see how that is a good offense, does it help you vent to see putin be fucked in the ass? Maybe he likes it, lol (ew), it just gives me 4chan PTSD :)

[-] iquanyin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

“maybe im a cuck …now what?” touché! 👍🤣

[+] diffuselight@lemmy.world -8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well you are not supposed to feel insulted. Context matters. Why would you be insulted, you enjoy cuckolding, good on you, love and let love. No issues with that, we all have our fetishes and one man’s insult is another’s climax - imagine you have a degradation fetish, man /r/the_donald would be so hot. The insult wasn’t aimed at you. You didn’t feel offended. So working as intended.

That’s the point - it’s insulting for tankies because they love strong macho Putin image whose definitely not a bottom. never, totally ever, ok, only a bit if you ask nicely with a coup.

What is annoying on the internet is that everyone thinks it’s about them and every statement has to be minimally offensive to everyone because of this, main character syndrome. It’s not nonsensical, it’s actually giving the right wing it’s power.

So no, I think I won’t be doing that. I’ll continue dishing out highly targeted insults and everyone else can learn that they are not meant to be offended because - as you say, there’s nothing offensive about it unless you are a right wing schmuck with a masculinity complex.

[-] Gsus4@feddit.nl 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Look, it's just trashy 4chan+r/the_Donald talk, but ok, use it to your heart's content if it means that much to you and holds such expressive value to you, we're all adults here and I'll just stop reading :) have a nice day.

[-] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I agree with you, it undermines his position and makes him look childish, but you tried.

load more comments (55 replies)

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023

415 points (90.6% liked)

World News

32089 readers

1323 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ml

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

jackmarxist@lemmy.ml

zephyreks@lemmy.ml

OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml