662
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 30 points 11 months ago

Yeah even first cousins are actually not that bad, biologically speaking, if it's only done for one (or probably even two?) generation.

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 4 points 11 months ago

AFAIK the risk is about the same as having a kid after 40.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Yup, and AFAIK, it's legal in some areas to have kids with your first cousin.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago

Probably legal in more places than it's illegal

[-] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It is, in fact, legal more places than not. Cousin marriage was extremely common for thousands of years. It only really started to drop off when people started owning cars and could meet people from further away. Most places still haven't changed their laws because the cultural change was so recent, and because it's low risk enough that it's not a serious concern if it's just once in a while rather than, say, medieval European royalty shenanigans.

this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
662 points (98.3% liked)

Greentext

7397 readers
944 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS