184
submitted 2 days ago by Garibaldee@lemm.ee to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 days ago

Seems that they only counted slaves from the South. I bet that including New England slave owners would take it from "many" to "most", if not even "almost all".

While not on an industrial scale like in the South, there was still a lot of slavery in the original colonies and their successor states, which played a big part in enabling generational wealth for any family rich enough to buy a slave at the time.

[-] huf@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

add in the NYC (i think that was the main hub, wasnt it?) elites who may not have owned significant number of slaves, but built their wealth on the slave trade

this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
184 points (99.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7300 readers
668 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS