133
submitted 23 hours ago by davel@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 17 hours ago

Not really. Only recently have they started sending modern long range missiles and semi modern fighter jets to Ukraine. Those were available since the start.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 17 hours ago

Things like missiles and fighter jets aren't instrumental in this conflict. If they were, then Russia would've won a long time ago because they've always had a massive superiority in both. This is primarily a war of attrition with 80% of casualties coming from artillery battles. The problem the west has is that it's simply not capable of producing things like artillery shells at the rate they're consumed.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago

True but that is because both sides are mostly doing the field battle thing like they did in the 1700 instead of trying to blow up all civilian infrastructure of the other party America style. Which Ukraine cannot do much because they would get nuked. And Russia so far has not done much either.

The entire war there is just very weird. There is no way for Ukraine to win besides getting nukes or somehow destroying all Russian oil without getting nuked. And both are basically impossible.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 16 hours ago

It's worth noting that Russia has largely dismantled Ukrainian power grid at this point. However, it very much looks like Russia is focusing on destroying the army itself first and foremost. I agree that it is absolutely illogical for the west to prolong the war at this point as it's becoming clear that Russia has won, and that the economic blow back for the west is worse than it is for Russia. The west is falling for the sunk cost fallacy here.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 5 points 15 hours ago

One twist is Ukraine is being used to get Europe to fund the American military industrial complex big time.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yup, it's absolutely clear looking at the completely nonsensical fearmongering "Putin will conquer entire Europe" which was up day one of the war.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 14 hours ago

I think it's becoming quite clear that destruction of Europe's economy was an objective of the war. The US was becoming increasingly worried about Europe's integration with the east. Europe was benefiting from Russian energy and Chinese manufacturing, while Russia and China provided large markets for Europeans goods. If things kept going the way they were then the US would eventually lose political grip over Europe. Now Europe has become entirely dependent on the US, and as its economy unravels it will become a new cheap labor market going forward.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 15 hours ago

One twist is Ukraine is being used to get Europe to fund the American military industrial complex big time.

[-] lorty@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 17 hours ago

True, but they wouldn't have changed the course of the war.

this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
133 points (88.0% liked)

World News

32498 readers
837 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS