667
instance wars (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 days ago by aradgus@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Is it still invalidating when someone using neopronouns is doing so disingenuously?

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Again, invalidating neopronouns is a cascading issue that results in witch-hunting and should be avoided.

[-] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Not sure I agree as it seems like black and white thinking.

I.e. I could imagine a scenario where someone is very obviously/admits to using neopronouns disingenuously and that would break my social contract with them to honour it.

If I make an assessment of neopronoun usage on a case by case basis I can still avoid witch hunts. It’s similar to how I determine in real life if someone is an asshole or not.

Another way; I can support a person who I genuinely believe uses neopronouns while denouncing and excluding someone who doesn’t.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

It is a very tricky slope. It's best to never compromise on neopronoun usage even with suspected trolls, they can be discredited without erasing the pronouns.

this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2025
667 points (96.3% liked)

Memes

46085 readers
3115 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS