94
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by Teknevra@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml

I've been using Lemmy for a while now, and I've noticed something that I was hoping to potentially discuss with the community.

As a leftist myself (communist), I generally enjoy the content and discussions on Lemmy.

However, I've been wondering if we might be facing an issue with ideological diversity.

From my observations:

  1. Most Lemmy Instances, news articles, posts, comments, etc. seem to come from a distinctly leftist perspective.
  2. There appears to be a lack of "centrist", non-political, or right-wing voices (and I don't mean extreme MAGA-type views, but rather more moderate conservative positions).
  3. Discussions often feel like they're happening within an ideological bubble.

My questions to the community are:

  • Have others noticed this trend?
  • Do you think Lemmy is at risk of becoming an echo chamber for leftist views, a sort of Truth Social, Parler, Gab, etc., esque platform, but for Leftists?
  • Is this a problem we should be concerned about, or is it a natural result of Lemmy's community-driven nature?
  • How might we encourage more diverse political perspectives while still maintaining a respectful and inclusive environment?
  • What are the potential benefits and drawbacks of having a more politically diverse user base on Lemmy?

As much as I align with many of the views expressed here, I wonder if we're missing out on valuable dialogue and perspective by not having a more diverse range of political opinions represented.

I'm genuinely curious to hear your thoughts on this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] frank@frank.casa -2 points 1 day ago

No, instead of putting them to death, they worked them to death. If they survived, they might get their freedom... and be watched by the KGB for the rest of their lives.

Also, to be fair, you have to look at specific time periods in Soviet and Russian history. Under some leaders, it was a very harsh prison sentence. Under other leaders, it was much worse.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

It must be so nice being an anti-communist, you can just say what ever made up bullshit comes into your head and expect people to believe you.

[-] scott@loves.tech -2 points 1 day ago

It is not made up. Read about Stalin. A lot of things happened when he was in power. And a lot of things changed after he was no longer in power.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

I have, that's why I know it's made up.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -1 points 1 day ago

My comment above was a cheeky joke but USSR had camps and people were worked to death in them.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulag

Sucks to suck being an ethnic minority and or being labeled an enemy of the "people"

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Thanks for demonstrating my point.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -1 points 1 day ago

You are denying historical facts about the regime ran by the Communist party of the Soviet union

It was brutal

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

It must be so nice being an anti-communist, you can just say what ever made up bullshit comes into your head and expect people to believe you.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 0 points 1 day ago

Was the gulag system under the Soviet regime a "what ever made up bullshit"?

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

The one you're describing (death camps where ethnic minorities are sent) is made up bullshit, yes. Also getting into Double Genocide theory.

this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
94 points (68.2% liked)

Fediverse

17920 readers
242 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS