4
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
4 points (100.0% liked)
Fediverse
32347 readers
558 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This is a mistake. When building any kind of team, you want diversity of experience, backgrounds, viewpoints etc. A mono-culture is extremely prone to group-think and is unlikely to generate ideas as quickly or elegantly as a team comprising many different types of people.
The second reason why I have always advised my teams not to consider "culture-fit" when interviewing prospective employees is that it is a covert way of discriminating against people who have otherwise protected attributes (race, religion, gender, sexuality etc).
You should hire people based on their ability to perform the job, and nothing else.
There's a difference between "culture fit" and "hive mindedness". I've seen singular employees turn a good workplace into one with strife because that one employee has vastly different goals about how to run things, and it doesn't go away until that employee is fired.
Also, it's not about discriminating against future hires. It's about not hiring shitty employees who would discriminate against their own co-workers.