540
They're been quiet for seventy days now.
(lemmy.world)
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
I voted for someone whose values, and whose party's values, are closer to what I believe is best for average citizens in the United States of America, based on hard data over the course of decades. If the other option was better for Palestine then maybe your argument would make sense...but that isn't the case, so it doesn't.
Instead, 3rd party voters voted for candidates that had absolutely, positively, undeniably no chance of winning, and now they get a president that least represents their ideals.
Real intelligent.
I responded to another comment of yours with the "we're not voting for them because we're not voting them" fallacy 2 hours ago. Apparently you didn't read it, or if you did, you failed to comprehend it. Link: https://lemmy.world/comment/14469499
A population using "chance of winning" (i.e. "is the population voting for them") as a criteria for voting for a candidate is circular logic and irrational. End of discussion. You can act like an arrogant know-it-all after you actually gain the first fucking clue what you're talking about.