444
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 45 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"Criminals they forced into the United States" = "Invasion"

"Repatriation" != "Deportation"

Repatriation is what happens when you return a POW to their country of origin. Deportation is when you return a criminal to their country of origin.

POWs are not entitled to access to the criminal justice system. They can be held indefinitely without charges, or returned to their country of origin, without judicial oversight. Since deportation is a judicial process, POWs are not subject to deportation.

POWs are not "subject to the jurisdiction" of US law; Trump is arguing that the children of "invader-immigrants" can't be citizens.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 14 points 3 days ago

The term repatriation is not in any way exclusive to POWs. It was, for example, used extensively during COVID when talking about voluntary repatriation of expats to their home countries.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 8 points 3 days ago

True. I should have been more clear: Deportation requires the involvement of the judicial branch. Repatriation has no such requirement. "Repatriation" is a more generic term for returning to one's country of origin.

I did not mean to suggest that "repatriation" was exclusive to POWs, and I apologize if I gave that impression. I meant to distinguish between judicial and non-judicial.

[-] ubergeek@lemmy.today 6 points 3 days ago

POWs are not entitled to access to the criminal justice system.

That's... Not true.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

POWs do not need to be charged with a crime. Indeed, under international treaties and laws governing armed conflict, POWs generally can't be criminally charged for simply participating in hostilities.

They can be held without charge until the conclusion of hostilities. They are not entitled to the protections afforded to the accused, because they are not accused. They are not entitled to access to the criminal justice system.

By describing them as "invaders", he is suggesting that immigrants be treated as enemy combatants.

this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
444 points (98.5% liked)

World News

32856 readers
455 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS