126
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
126 points (90.9% liked)
And Finally...
1249 readers
87 users here now
A place for odd or quirky world news stories.
Elsewhere in the Fediverse:
- !weirdnews@real.lemmy.fan
- !offbeat@lemmy.ca
- !nottheonion@lemmy.world
- !nottheonion@lemmy.ml
- !nottheonion@zerobytes.monster
- !aiop@lemmy.world
- !jingszo@lemmy.world
- !forteana@feddit.uk
- !strangetimes@lemmy.world
- !goodnews@feddit.uk
- !upliftingnews@lemmy.world
Rules:
- Be excellent to each other
- The Internet will resurface old "And finally..." material. Just mark it [VINTAGE]
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
If you would like to read the actual case report: https://hackertalks.com/post/6269770
What is super interesting, is this person consumed 30,000 calories per day, and still lost weight. Admittedly they were eating way too much fat. But it's still interesting
I imagine with such a large amount of fat, most of it was sliding right through him - I'd not want to see the state of his toilet. He's probably solely responsible for the local fatberg.
The main thing to take away from the case study is really just that Xanthelasma exists and that you can get it with this kind of diet. That's more or less all the case study was saying
The rest of the case study isn't really anything to make much note of. The original case report does not quote a caloric figure. It is also relying on the patient stating that they were losing weight vs any actual measurements. If they were to be eating 30,000 kcal/day and losing weight, something has got to be absurdly wrong with their digestive system
I'm not a foodologist, but that seems like more than the usual amount.
Indeed, foodology is a under researched field, but for most people 2,500 is normal. Athletes can spike up to 10,000.
Thank you, foodologist.