63
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Internetexplorer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

He's helping himself by publishing the results for everyone? That doesn't even make sense.

You're being obtuse and and I question your intentions in have a good faith argument.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago

He may think it helps others to publish his results. Or maybe it's just a publicity stunt. But neither of those motivations mean that the results will be worth a shit.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago

Multiple people have already told why that "data" is useless. Why are you defending this guy so hard?

[-] Internetexplorer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Because he's trying to do something good. Why are you attacking him so hard?

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago

You're assuming his actual intentions are what he declares them to be. Hey, maybe they are. But there's no way of knowing that.

But I try a lot of things and fail. So does everyone else. What matters is not his intention, but the quality of the results. And the way he's collecting and reporting his results is undisciplined and unscientific.

But you don't seem all that able to understand either science or the human character, so I'm going to cut my losses and stop trying to explain it to you. Maybe some day, when I'm bored, I'll come up with a doggy-doggy horsey-horsey version and try again.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Publicly giving out information about the erections of his 19-year-old son is doing something good?

You've got a lot of self reflection to do, friend.

[-] Internetexplorer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I don't know about that but it's funny you focus only on that.

What about the sleep data, food data, exercise data?

You're only focusing on a small part of the research. Which makes me think you're buying have this discussion in good faith

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

We're in a post specifically about that, Einstein. Lol

And agian. Multiple people have already explained to you why his published data is useless. Read the words you're looking at.

[-] Internetexplorer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think that the food industry don't want you to be healthy and smear campaigns like this are attacking this guy

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The ...gay food industry?
I don't even know where to begin digesting that one.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Looks like that was a mistake and he removed the "gay" reference. Not sure what he actually intended to write, though.

this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
63 points (94.4% liked)

Not The Onion

13135 readers
199 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS