The federation drama really drives home the fact that liberals despise anyone and everyone with better politics than themselves. They want a monopoly on "being good" and being shown up enrages them. (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 year ago by KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

128 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Every liberal does it too, from center right radlibs to far-right "conservatives": the most extreme right fringe liberals hate the mainstream liberals for not being bigoted enough, the mainstream libs hate the radlibs for not being cruel enough, and the radlibs hate the left for not being chauvinist enough.

Denouncing chauvinism in particular is like a liberal moral event horizon, a cardinal sin against their self-interested belief in the righteousness of the imperial hegemon that keeps the treats flowing at gunpoint.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I think it is more "They hate the possibility that they could be wrong about things." including their morals and politics.

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

A lot of liberal politics is comparing themselves to fascists and saying, "hey at least I'm better than that guy". They can define themselves by being the only ideological position that tolerated minorities and is "moral". Then leftists put an end to that idea because we are even more relentless in our support for marginalized groups. It's a big reason why liberals love to pretend many socialists and communists are huge bigots, it's why the proverbial Bernie bro became a boogeyman. If liberals don't have their moral high ground, they don't have anything.

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Oh damn, I guess that's the real horseshoe theory. Or I suppose the reasoning behind it. If "tankies" are the same as fascists, there is no cognitive dissonance for a liberal, because they are still morally better.