118
Confusing warning (sopuli.xyz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Godort@lemm.ee 152 points 2 weeks ago

I honestly prefer Valve's method. You as a consumer should be reading what you're buying before you purchase anyway, and you can still use their refund system if you somehow missed the warning.

Removing unfinished games from the storefront just increases the amount of lost media out there. These projects should be available for as long as possible simply for archival reasons.

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

How about if valve has an agreement with developers where if they release a game in early access, and then abandon it, it switches to free-to-play?

Developers don't have to pay for the servers, and the source code isn't released. Gamers get to still play it, if it had any redeeming qualities, or for nostalgia. And valve gets...uhh... community goodwill? Honestly the lack of benefits for valve is probably why this will never happen.

load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
118 points (69.7% liked)

Memes

47803 readers
887 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS