1470
Windows 11 vs Linux supported HW
(lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
1470 points (95.8% liked)
Linux
48236 readers
630 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Even that is a myth nowadays. Wayland is still hit and miss, but with x11, it's as good as Intel or AMD.
And, if the guys at System76 keep their promises (and historically, they have), with the release of COSMIC, even that will be fixed for good :)
How is a desktop environment gonna fix Nvidia being incompatible with Wayland?
According to what they say, they're writing this DE with Wayland and Nvidia's Wayland compatibility in mind.
So far, they've always been trustworthy, so, I'm inclined to believe their statements.
Linux graphics stack only supports implicit sync, Nvidia only supports explicit sync. It's not something that a desktop environment can fix as patches are needed to be implemented in Nvidia drivers, Wayland protocols, XWayland and maybe even Mesa or the kernel itself.
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues/1317
Well yeah on x11 its pretty good but on wayland its hell. And i use wayland -_-.
May I ask why? At the moment, there's no real reason which applies to most users for which one should use Wayland rather than x11.
Most distros came up with solutions to the obvious ones (think of PopOS for gestures in Gnome x11).
Most people want to use Wayland because it's the new shiny toy, but they haven't actually got a practical reason for it.
And don't get me wrong, I'll be the first one to move to Wayland when it becomes fully viable across the board without IFs, but we're not there yet, and x11, despite being on life support does everything most people might need from it (save from some edge case with multiple monitors with different resolutions and aspect ratios, with different refresh rates).