518
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
518 points (77.3% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7610 readers
324 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Wow a travel blogger said they didn't see any signs of genocide?!? Case closed boys!
Thing is: kinda? With Palestine you were able to find new footage every day of innocents being exterminated, there's never been even remotely anything compared to that in Xinjiang
Is it possible that the travel bloggers simply didn't go to the concentration camps?
Everyone in China has a smartphone, as you probably known people pay 90% of the time using QR codes with WeChat or Alipay. It's not believable that there isn't footage of the "horrendous concentration camps" plastered all over western media, if there was any footage, we'd be exposed to it nonstop
Everyone in america has a camera I wonder why there arnt any pictures from inside area 51?
Did you come up with that on your own?
People don't claim that they forcibly placed 1 million Americans in Area 51 though
When they let the travel bloggers in we'll know =P You'd have to be impossibly naive to think the government wouldn't beat to death anyone who photographed the concentration camps...
China's government isn't exactly known for beating people to death. The cops murdering a given ethnicity at astonishing rates is an american thing.
You see what you're doning though? You're starting from the assumption that the Chinese government is murderous and genocidal, and any evidence presented to you simply can be disregarded.
Begging the question
Ad hominem
Don’t bother: this person self-identifies as a horseshoe theorist. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy.
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/u/thann
What else can one expect from an instance that explicitly bans “tankie shit”?
Nope, an ad hominem would be if I said something like "you lied before why should anyone believe you now". The conclusion of my logical analysis was that "you must be corrupt to believe that". If you're concerned with fallacies read up on "appeal to authority" because you're a one trick pony