519
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by Confidant6198@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Don’t bother: this person self-identifies as a horseshoe theorist. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy.

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/u/thann

Communism is just Fascism rebranded

What else can one expect from an instance that explicitly bans “tankie shit”?

[-] thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nope, an ad hominem would be if I said something like "you lied before why should anyone believe you now". The conclusion of my logical analysis was that "you must be corrupt to believe that". If you're concerned with fallacies read up on "appeal to authority" because you're a one trick pony

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
519 points (77.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7610 readers
710 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS