430
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works to c/canada@lemmy.ca

This Black History Month, it’s important to recognize that economic injustice—both in Canada and around the world—is deeply rooted in racism. The property system in Canada was founded on the forced displacement and exclusion of Indigenous peoples from their land and immigration policies that prevented non-white immigration, effectively barring many thousands of people from accessing property in Canada. These racialized colonial systems laid the foundation for the current racial wealth gap, where racialized Canadians have about half as much wealth as their non-racialized counterparts.

Unlike the United States, where constitutional barriers have historically shielded the ultra-rich from direct taxation, Canada faces no such constitutional legal obstacles—only political ones. And those political excuses are running out.

A wealth tax enjoys overwhelming public support. Nearly 90 percent of Canadians back it, yet successive Liberal and Conservative governments have refused to act. Their refusal isn’t due to legal constraints but to the immense influence of corporate lobbyists and billionaire donors who oppose any effort to make them pay their fair share.

Just last year, powerful corporate interests mobilized to kill a progressive tax measure that would have primarily targeted Canada’s wealthiest citizens and corporations: the partial closure of the capital gains loophole.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WorkshopBubby@lemmy.ca -3 points 2 days ago

I don't think a wealth tax is smart. I think the current slate of billionaires that are aligned with fascism should be rounded up and executed. But I am pretty sure every economist agrees that a wealth tax doesn't make any sense mathematically. People have a bunch of stock either because of founding companies or investing early, and then the public gets to buy the stock, if the public thinks a company is valuable the stock rises and people become wealthy. It doesn't mean that they actually have that much money that they can deploy. I think it makes more sense to have rules that prevent people using their stock as collateral for loans.

[-] conicalscientist@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Your parents witnessed the fall of communism. We are here to witness the fall of capitalism. Your stocks will be worthless. Don't worry about taxes.

[-] WorkshopBubby@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

??? wont the taxes also be worthless then? Do you think I am against taxes or something?

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

But I am pretty sure every economist agrees that a wealth tax doesn't make any sense mathematically

I find it difficult to believe you could come to this conclusion in good faith, given how many serious economists advocate for wealth tax.

This economist wrote an award winning book on the topic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_in_the_Twenty-First_Century, where he advocates for a wealth tax.

[-] WorkshopBubby@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago

If you think it's "bad faith" to be against a wealth tax, then I know for a fact you have not looked into any debate about the topic, because there absolutely no consensus. Maybe you have a book that argues in favor of a wealth tax and that's fine, I am open to arguments in favor of it. But saying I'm bad faith, when I suggested an alternative, is fucking removed.

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Your supposition that "every economist agrees that a wealth tax doesn't make any sense mathematically", I find in bad faith, not that you are against it. It's obvious that you are against it.

Maybe you have a book that argues in favor of a wealth tax

I don't see how you could talk about economics and not know about that book.

[-] WorkshopBubby@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago
[-] fosho@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

lol you've clearly been bested here. take the L and rephrase your claims to be less provably false next time.

[-] WorkshopBubby@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Yes totally I have been bested I admit it. There is no contention around a wealth tax. Economists generally agree its a good idea and will be a successful policy.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 2 days ago

Hey champ check this one out...

We all pay property taxes on houses we own or rent... so why can't owner of stock pay a property tax?

Asking for a friend.

[-] WorkshopBubby@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago

Okay so how would it work? Would you tax once a year based on the value of their portfolio?

this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
430 points (98.4% liked)

Canada

8161 readers
2251 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS