758
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 135 points 4 days ago

A software engineer was not involved in this if waterfall is painted positively.

I think the last time I heard an engineer unironically advocating for a waterfall IRL was about a decade ago and they were the one of the crab-in-a-bucket, I-refuse-to-learn-anything-new types—with that being the very obvious motivation for their push-back.

[-] MechanicalJester@lemmy.world 42 points 4 days ago

Waterfall: Spend 10 years compiling written functional and technical requirements. Cancel the program due to budget overrun.

[-] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 days ago

Yeah, waterfall would be "you collect requirements to build a rocket to Mars, 2 years later you have a rocket to Venus and it turns out they didn't think oxygen is essential, they'll have to add that in the next major release."

[-] idefix@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago

And here I am, running projects for the past 20 years mostly using agile, and still very much unconvinced about its supposed superiority over waterfall.

this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
758 points (93.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

21172 readers
1115 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS