36
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
36 points (97.4% liked)
Casual Conversation
2526 readers
211 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES (updated 01/22/25)
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
- Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
- Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
- !actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
- !askmenover30@lemm.ee
- !dads@feddit.uk
- !letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk
- !movies@lemm.ee
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
My guess for the dodecahedra is that they're a tool to aid with cryptography. This video explains it well, but TL;DW you'd use the dodecahedron with two concentric circles full of letters, and rotate one to know which letter to replace with which. It's a slightly more advanced and secure version of Caesar's cypher, and I could easily see the Romans doing something like that.
On the other hand I wouldn't expect them to be used for knitting or jewellery, as simpler devices would do the same job.
...but to answer your question, I think that most decor items will give those archaeologists a hard time. Stuff like this:
I was almost going to say "yerba mate bombillas", but they'll likely detect saliva DNA in them and guess that they were used as straws:
Maybe it is a toy, or like a fidget spinner. Idn I stim a lot that looks like it would be awesome for stimming, first thought.
Another running theory is knitting.
I think it's unlikely to be a knitting tool, as you could achieve the same with a simpler tool.
For example, I've seen people saying it's for wool gloves. But a bar with five holes and some knobs would do the trick, no need for an intricate form like a dodeca.
Respectfully, do you knit?
I don't knit. I'm saying this based on multiple factors:
1. Videos of people who knit trying to use a dodecahedron. Like this one or this one. They use the holes, they use the knobs, but the core shape of the tool itself is practically irrelevant, and if anything it gets in the way. Also note the end result, it's way crappier than a good knitter could do by hand. (I might not knit but I do see people knitting all the time.)
2. The existence of a similar icosahedron. It could be used just fine for cyphers, but not for knitting - note how the holes are too small. (Also, you wouldn't need so many faces.)
3. The Romans assigned manual labour - like knitting - to slaves. And slaves aren't exactly the sort of person a Roman would waste precious bronze with, specially not for a tool with an excessively specific purpose, like this one.
4. Wool production in Rome was mostly around Gallia Cisalpina:
And yet those dodecahedra were mostly found around Germania, Belgica, Lugdunensis, some even in Britannia:
If anything the distribution hints more something military.
... I suddenly want one of those statues but with a cats head instead.