72
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

In case anyone had the same kneejerk reaction: no, this is not about privacy etc. Just performance, according to OOP.

Still, this reads like a reaction to a recent overblown debacle.

edit: no, it actually does say "hardened security" in the README, lol, but the whole project seems to boil down to some compiler flags.

[-] wondrous_strange@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Honestly, OOP should've broadcast that fact. It is a lot easier sell than letting people think they changed the code somehow.

Not sure why they are trying to show it as a seperate project.

[-] 4oreman@lemy.lol 0 points 1 day ago

*not overblown

this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
72 points (90.0% liked)

Open Source

33247 readers
287 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS