89
submitted 1 week ago by Stern@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

If the Japanese want people to work 80 hour weeks (and go drinking with their boss every night) maybe they should make polyamorous marriage a thing. Kids are a lot easier to deal with if you have help.

[-] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 2 points 1 week ago

From what i heard from people and read online, i really don't understand how people even do that. Japanese work etiquette is bananas. But that aside, my job is somewhat high demand, but i draw the line at work hours. I work 42 hours a week and not a second longer. That opens up enough times for some hobbies, enough free time and everything. But if i had kids, most of that would be gone. So if you're a work horse, you're expected to give up everything, except work and raising kids.

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Literally: they don't go home, that's how

Hearing about salary men sleeping on the streets or in train stations is one thing, but when I actually finally saw them in person it broke my fucking brain

Imagine the homelessness issues of a major Californian city but instead of homeless people it's a bunch of clearly drunk dudes in suits who all vanish by morning

My wife cried hard because the realization hit that hard

[-] commander@lemmings.world -1 points 1 week ago

Yeah. Only rich people should have exclusive access to women.

[-] cornshark@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

You seem sarcastic, but biologically speaking, the children of rich parents are much more likely to be born rich themselves. Isn't that a direction we want to evolve into for humanity, given that being born poor has so many negative outcomes?

[-] answersplease77@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

me and my ex already both tested poor before we had our first baby, so we went ahead with the abortion because the dotor determined he was going to be born poor anway

[-] Lux18@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

biologically speaking, the children of rich parents are much more likely to be born rich themselves

Bro, what? Biologically speaking? What are you talking about?
The kids of rich people are rich because their parents are rich. They grow up to be rich because they have their parents wealth, which they either use to create more, or just stay rich.
The fact that they're rich has nothing to do with their "biology".

What are you proposing anyway? That only rich people procreate and then somehow eventually everyone will be rich? If you can do simple math like addition and subtraction, you'll realize that that scenario is not possible.

[-] T156@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Plus wealth generally means power and connections, all of which makes it easier for someone to get wealthy.

Microsoft would almost certainly have never become what it is if Bill Microsoft wasn't wealthy enough to have a family computer ahead of most people being able to have one at home, and his mother wasn't friends with an IBM chair.

Naturally, IBM would be much more likely to hire someone who comes with the recommendation of a higher-up than Afferige Mann, who is applying based on an ad in the paper, and has only worked retail.

Plus wealth gives a safety net. It didn't matter for Bill if the first few Microsofts failed, he can try again until he hits it big. Afferige has non-such luck. If he starts a company and it folds, he may not have the money to start another.

[-] coldsideofyourpillow@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 week ago

That's a form of eugenics. More specifically, it would be classed as "positive social eugenics".

ClarificationThe use of the term "positive" does not mean it is a "good" thing. It just means that individuals with percieved "desirable" traits are encouraged to mate more than the "undesirables". Conversely, an example of negative eugenics would be murdering/sterilizing the "undesirables".

"Social eugenics" simply means that the "desirable" trait is not genetic, but rather a social construct, in this case wealth.

[-] commander@lemmings.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If we can all be rich, then sure.

Otherwise it's just a tool to breed average people out of the gene pool. The end result are rulers and servants. Guess which one your kids will be.

Keep in mind, the only reason why some people don't have enough is because others have too much.

[-] qarbone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I think we all largely get what you're speaking to but I feel compelled to highlight that you can't breed average people out. "Rulers" and "servants" are social classes, and not "in the gene pool."

The message got a little muddled there.

[-] commander@lemmings.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

that you can’t breed average people out.

Actually, you can. I'm referring to the middle class and their increasing difficulty in raising a family. A significant amount of them are choosing not to, which literally means they don't get to carry on their lineage.

I'm not going to get into the whys, but very poor people do not have the issue with reproducing that the middle class has.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There is no "middle class". There's labor and capital. You're either serving or getting served. I know very well where I'm at. :/

Duckduckgo "myth middle class" and take your poison of choice.

[-] commander@lemmings.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's not entirely true.

People in the middle class have disposable income that lower class people do not. Many of them have enough wealth to live comfortably for the rest of their lives without ever having to work again.

this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
89 points (98.9% liked)

World News

43299 readers
1039 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS