177
The US may be able to remotely disable F-35 aircraft
(www.defensemirror.com)
What's going on Canada?
๐ Meta
๐บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories
๐๏ธ Cities / Local Communities
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
๐ Sports
Hockey
Football (NFL): incomplete
Football (CFL): incomplete
Baseball
Basketball
Soccer
๐ป Schools / Universities
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
๐ต Finance, Shopping, Sales
๐ฃ๏ธ Politics
๐ Social / Culture
Rules
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
If true, that could be a massive problem if communications get damaged in a conflict, even if the US is not acting maliciously.
I haven't been able to identify the source from which I first got the information, unfortunately, but other stuff I've found while looking makes me think there may indeed be a comms issue: ODIN, the new software platform for these birds that's now being put into production, is repeatedly described as "cloud-based". That and one site's cryptic reference to "F-35 crypto ignition keys" do not exactly inspire confidence in me. Or at least, if whatever I read first was a misinterpretation, I can kind of see where it was coming from.
Yeah, cloud based authentication (or features/functions) is a massive red flag for any piece of equipment that you need to rely on in changing and unpredictable situations.
crypto ignition keys (CIKs) are just setup tools to load bootstrap keys into a device.
like, for instance, if you've just unboxed a secure telephone, there's no keys in it, so you have to use a CIK to load keys/ciphers into the phone before you can make calls from it.
the private sector doesn't use them much, but NSA invented them and they've been a staple of IC infra for decades.