29

No comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

and crush anyone who would go against that gangsterism millitarily

Are you seriusly arguing that taking war off the table is "unfair"?

Economic problems, even international economic conflicts, should have economic solutions.

Not military ones.


Ukraine was invaded because it was the one country where Putin thought he might still have sufficient support.

I am fully convinced he genuinely believed it would be over in three days.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Ukraine isn't a progressive country, though. They banned leftist parties and contain Nazi brigades like Azov. If Putin wanted to "oppose Western Values," he'd target a country representing them.

As for the natural resources, this makes more sense, and is actually a secondary reason behind the invasion, the primary one of course being what they initially pushed for in the peace talks at the beginning of the war a few years ago, NATO neutrality and demillitarization. Now that that peace deal didn't go through, they are eyeing ways to recuperate the cost of war.

NATO isn't about "taking war off the table." There isn't an "economic solution" to Imperialism that would not be resisted millitarily by NATO. See Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Korea, Libya, Cambodia, Cuba, etc. NATO is about mantaining a brutally oppressive international system of exploiting the Global South for super-profits in the Imperialist countries.

Even economic solutions like de-dollarization are met with millitary aggression and coups from NATO countries.

this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
29 points (83.7% liked)

World News

34719 readers
663 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS