91
submitted 1 week ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

We're going to nominate someone who does things you find abhorrent. We will put all our resources into making certain that no one who prioritizes what you prioritize makes it through the primaries, and not really give much of a shit about the general. We will shout abuse at you for all criticism, demand but never think of earning your vote, and blame you every time we lose, regardless of how you vote.

We will fervently and lovingly kiss the asses of the worst republicans of the previous decades just to gloat about how far to the right we've taken the party.

[-] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago

When has any leading Democrat "shouted abuse" at the voting public?

You seem to taking the unpopularity of your politics very personally and blaming the Democratic Party as an institution - as opposed to the majority of Americans, who just don't agree with you.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Your shitty wing of the party lost to trump twice because it wouldn't listen to the people.

[-] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago

I take it by your ignoring my first question you don't have an actual answer.

Your shitty wing would have lost by more. People thought Kamala was too far left. The only people insisting she was too far right wouldn't have turned out to vote regardless. It's your own fault. Your side is politically irrelevant.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Your shitty wing would have lost by more.

My wing doesn't support genocide.

People thought Kamala was too far left. The only people insisting she was too far right wouldn’t have turned out to vote regardless.

She tried to court them and only them anyway.

EDIT: misread as "not far enough to the right." If people who thought she was too far to the right were so insignificant that they could be safely ignored, they're too insignificant to blame for the loss she earned by moving to the right to please your shitty wing of the party.

[-] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago

According to you, your wing got Trump elected, so it does.

Was healthcare, civil rights, education and equitable taxation not enough of a carrot?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

According to you, your wing got Trump elected, so it does.

Now where did I say that? Your wing is the one that thought genocide was the most winningest issue ever.

[-] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago

Your obvious implication is that if Kamala put on a keffiyeh, people would have turned out en mass to vote for her. The implication being your side sitting this one out gave Trump the election.

And, considering he did win, it would appear that genocide is a winning strategy.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Your obvious implication is that if Kamala put on a keffiyeh, people would have turned out en mass to vote for her.

You're continuing to be ridiculous. All she had to do was put one lousy photon of daylight between her and biden on the subject. That was too big an ask.

The implication being your side sitting this one out gave Trump the election.

We tried to warn you that it would happen. We could read the writing on the wall. Your wing chose to ignore it because you just loved genocide that much.

And, considering he did win, it would appear that genocide is a winning strategy.

If you're trying to appeal to people who love genocide, it is. That's republicans. They were never going to vote for harris. That's the problem with moving to the right. republicans don't believe you but democrats do,

[-] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago

You were never going to vote for Harris.

You would rather whine about Democrats than actually act to prevent the Republicans from actually engaging in genocide.

Because the God honest truth is you don't give a fuck about Gaza. This is all about stroking your ego and that is all it has ever been about. And that is why you will remain totally irrelevant, because you don't aim to accomplish anything and nobody will ever support your political ego trip.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

You were never going to vote for Harris.

I did vote for harris. I also tried to warn the pro-genocide wing of the party what would happen. Lots of people like me did. Pretty sure centrists knew and didn't care as long as no one listened to the left.

this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
91 points (96.9% liked)

politics

22011 readers
2654 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS