133
Wait, why is the White House using Starlink to ‘improve Wi-Fi’?
(www.theverge.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
133 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
39534 readers
469 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
They could have easily made up an excuse like "contingency in case of a terrorist attack where national infrastructure is damaged" or something that's actually believable and feasible, lol
It’s a military fortress housing the head of one of the most militaristic nations on Earth. It has redundancies.
I think it would make more sense if (their excuse was that) this was just another redundancy
There are so many better options to whatever they said, like there are so many better options for a properly run government. These days I just assume this is how the the US people (as a whole, I know many do not want this) want their government run, which is troubling but expected nowadays, unfortunately.
They’re letting the terrorism button cool off a bit, considering its basically not been let up since September 2001.