165
submitted 2 weeks ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 103 points 2 weeks ago

“The vaccination has stuff we don’t trust,” he said. “We don’t like the vaccinations, what they have these days. We heard too much, and we saw too much.”

The man's daughter died. I can't think of anything worse than that. But still "we don't trust the vaccine". How can you possibly break through when even a child dying isn't enough to convince them? This sucks so much.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 37 points 2 weeks ago

You need people whom they trust to start telling them the truth. It doesn't work if they don't trust the messenger

[-] Calcifer@eviltoast.org 36 points 2 weeks ago

At this point, I don't know if even someone trusted would be able to change his mind. Admitting to being wrong about vaccines means admitting he basically killed their daughter. Horribly sad.

[-] CallateCoyote@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

Even Trump was boo’d when he told his flock to take the Covid-19 vaccine.

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

They voted him back anyway! Couldn't that be a lesson to this dolt?

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

The sad thing is that this disgusting fuck isn't rotting in prison for murdering his own daughter through gross negligence.

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

That's the real reason why he'll always double down. That sorry of realisation can fuck someone up and make them shut down to the idea of it completely.

[-] TVA@thebrainbin.org 37 points 2 weeks ago

A child dying is going to make them double down, honestly. At this point they will REALLY refuse to acknowledge that the kids death was 100% their fault since taking accountability is not something these people are willing to do

[-] Benjaben@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I almost wonder if it's the same mechanism as the sunk cost fallacy, where a losing situation is irrationally maintained because of how unpleasant we find loss.

Edit to add: def no disagreement about refusing accountability though, that's such a pattern with that kind of personality. And not to give them TOO much grace but frankly I'm not sure I myself would act defensibly or even sanely right after losing a child.

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

At this point, it’s a rationalization, not a belief.

If he changed his mind and thought “maybe I should have gotten her the vaccine” then it means that he directly caused his daughter’s death. If he changes his mind later that maybe vaccines aren’t so bad, that means his stupid, selfish choice caused his daughter’s death.

I don’t know of many people that could handle that realization. So his mind just rejects it out of principle.

[-] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Well, denial is the first stage of grief. I wonder who the anger stage will be directed at.

[-] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 6 points 2 weeks ago

It's because he can just make more kids, but distrust in vaccines must remain firm! Wonder if they'll use the dead daughter's name again, that's what my mom's family did when infants died of scarlet fever and diphtheria back in the day.

this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
165 points (98.2% liked)

News

28200 readers
2026 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS