663
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 101 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hatred of the poor is universal phenomenon that cuts across all cultures, and yet does not even have a name. The closest we have is "classism", but this is something different. This isn't a preference or a bias, people go out of their way to abuse the poor. Abusing the poor fills some kind of emotional need.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

Hatred of the poor is universal phenomenon that cuts across all cultures, and yet does not even have a name.

I think it's a kind of Just-world fallacy, "If I see people suffering, they must be bad people who did something to deserve it, because the world is just and people get what they deserve."

Kind of a separate thing, but I think the psychological need fulfilled by that fallacy comes down to "I do not need to worry about this bad thing happening to me because I believe I am a good person and bad things don't normally happen to good people. Not worrying about this is important because my very busy life has not given me the time to develop any other coping skills for that kind worry, and so if I did dwell on how this bad thing could very easily happen to me I would probably just be overcome with anxiety and depression."

[-] neatchee@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

This, 100%. How people view the homeless (as a group, if not individually) is the quintessential, textbook example of just-world fallacy.

And your interpretation that it is a coping mechanism is also accurate. People need to resolve the cognitive dissonance of "I'm a good person, and good people help the homeless, but I'm not helping the homeless for X,Y,Z (possibly legitimate) reasons". One of the easiest ways to resolve that is the just-world fallacy

[-] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The rich man's wealth is in the city
Vexation of the soul is vanity
Destruction of the poor is their poverty
The poor man's wealth is in a holy, holy place

--Peter Tosh, "Fools Die (For Want of Wisdom)"

[-] RustyShackleford@literature.cafe 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think it also comes down to the reality there is no purpose or reasoning for our existence. And the more money and time you have to realize it, the more the mind needs to have the conclusion, but, there has to be more. So they strive to create a fanciful story to follow... otherwise, the veneer cracks. Personally, I find a sense of serenity in the idea, but I might be a rarity. Either way, just my ramblings on it lol

[-] Paragone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

it's got to do with presumed entitlement ( altering one's identity's frame-of-"rightful"-reference ), then with prejudice:

IF I have privilege that those homeless-scum/underclass lives don't,

AND my privilege is inherent, or earned, or bestowed-by-G-D,

THEN their inferiority is inherent, or earned, or put-on-them-by-god.

ergo, prejudice's justification, & only through protecting-itself can prejudice gain greater significance..

( I'm saying this as a guy whose 1st homeless experience was in about 1983, & I've earned 7+y of outright homelessness )

it's definitely identity-rooted, & it's definitely segregation-of-validity-to-the-privileged unconscious-mind mechanism.

As others have pointed-out, through the ages, prejudice is often attacking others out of fear for one's own weak/flawed "validity"..

so, attacking the "nonvalid" in order to protect the "validity" of the "superiors..

I don't think any mechanism more-involved than that is required, to understand it being normal all 'round the world..

_ /\ _

this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
663 points (98.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

11394 readers
203 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS