183
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dditty@lemm.ee 77 points 2 months ago

This is why I hate minesweeper, that you can do everything right and have it come down to a 50/50 feels unsatisfying

[-] rockerface@lemm.ee 58 points 2 months ago

Most of modern minesweeper implementation can generate a 100% solvable board, so it's not that bad.

[-] Donkter@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

On the other end, this is why I don't play minesweeper. As long as you're even half-meticulous about it it's a solved game with not many distinct patterns on the board. It's like a few steps above tic-tac-toe in how solvable it is.

At least solitaire has some decision points and it can be a minute before you figure out the strategy to solving it. Learning the rules of minesweeper is learning how to beat it every time.

[-] fubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago

I like setting a 16x16 board with 70 mines and going through a few of them if I'm waiting for something. There's enough that it can be entertaining.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
183 points (98.9% liked)

AnarchyChess

5695 readers
5 users here now

Holy hell

Other chess communities:
!Chess@lemmy.ml
!chessbeginners@sh.itjust.works

Matrix space

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS