34
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
34 points (90.5% liked)
Asklemmy
47134 readers
1156 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
No, and in fact the industry is going to see a reduction as people and companies are realising it's not a silver bullet solution or even that great at what it does.
The next branch of LLM modeling (now AGI is failing), is likely towards specialisation. Specialised AI problem solving has far more potential than chasing an ill defined and half formed concept of "intelligence".
No term can exist on its own like that. Everything is relative.
This. LLMs are great for information retrieval tasks, that is, they are essentially search engines. Even then, they can only retrieve information that they are trained on, so eventually, the data can get stale and the model will require retraining on more recent data. Also, they are not very good with tasks that require reasoning such as solving complex engineering problems.
I agree with that
and that too