33
Do you think reptile live feeding is animal abuse?
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
33 points (90.2% liked)
Casual Conversation
2907 readers
280 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES (updated 01/22/25)
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
- Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
- Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
- !actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
- !askmenover30@lemm.ee
- !dads@feddit.uk
- !letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk
- !movies@lemm.ee
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
That's a horrible way to die. When you feel like suffocating it's not lack of oxygen but excess carbon dioxide. Breathing in pure CO2 causes instant panic attack on even people with a brain damage making them unable to feel fear. Nitrogen is the gas you want to use - CO2 is among the worst possible choices. Even drowning them would probably be more humane.
In humans, it's blood co2 levels that moderate our breathing. We don't feel the lack of oxygen we feel the buildup of co2. A hammer would be more humane if rodents use the same chemo receptors.
So you're saying it's like the lethal injection? Not actually a peaceful way to die but just looks so to outsiders?
CO2 poisoning does not look peaceful to outsiders
Yeah, I worked in a biology lab that regrettably used co2 for euthanizing mice. They would struggle, and begin to thrash uncontrollably as they ran out of oxygen, then they would slow down until they are just barely twitching before all movement completely ceases. It's a disgusting way to die.
In the case of CO2 asphyxiation, it doesn’t even appear peaceful to an outside observer. There are videos online showing what it actually looks like, and it’s not pretty.
Rodents burrow. Unlike humans, they detect low oxygen environments, so even inert gas asphyxiation is painful for them.