262
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
262 points (99.6% liked)
Futurology
2414 readers
300 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
99% effective is nowhere near 100%, perhaps counterintuitively. Sex twice a week for a year and you're probably in deep shit.
The only birth control that is 100% effective is not having sex.
Vasectomies aren't 100% foolproof.
Now how in the hell is female sterilization not 100%?
Even after tubal litigation it's possible to still get pregnant if the fallopian tubes grow back together or if another tube/path forms. It's somewhat rare (0.5% of women who have had the procedure could get pregnant again)
Yeah sure but that's not what sterilisation means. To be sterile means you're not making any gametes whatsoever, which typically means a complete removal of the gonads (ie an oophrectomy or orchidectomy). Otherwise you're not sterile, you're just infertile.
Isn't there a chance vasectomies don't take either?
It's a lot easier to double check in men.
It's almost 100% because "proper usage" includes periodic checks.
But the same thing can happen with vasectomies so why isn't it showing anything there?
Vasectomies are a lot easier to double check. A woman released 1 egg a month. A man released a LOT of swimmers every shot. Go in a cup and check for swimmers.
Guessing it's more female "sterilization"
I remember hearing that in rare cases, getting their tubes tied can actually heal.
OK that’s great and everything and hurrah for the snipped, V for Victory yadda yadda…
But really, a chart on contraception made by Dr. Dick Beatty?!
I’m crying over here
I don't get it. Does that mean on average a couple using condoms for 10 years will be pregnant 1.5 times?